Cold fusion: Revision history

19 September 2008

• curprev 14:4914:49, 19 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 34,005 bytes +2,804‎ Add a more positive-sounding section describing progress. Will now add figs.

17 September 2008

• curprev 14:1514:15, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,372 bytes +171‎ Link to photos and papers on explosions.
• curprev 13:1713:17, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 31,201 bytes +1‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 12:5012:50, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,210 bytes +10‎ This should be a separate paragraph, I think.
• curprev 12:4812:48, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,200 bytes +71‎ It is not "extreme" cavitation. That would destroy the apparatus. It is well focused and precise. The effect is not hypothesized; it is detected experimentally. It is disputed.
• curprev 12:4012:40, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,202 bytes +73‎ Panels did not say "not enough evidence for cold fusion existed for the federal government to finance further research" Both panels recommended funding. Suggest you read final reports.
• curprev 12:0812:08, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,149 bytes +20‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 12:0712:07, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,133 bytes +4‎ Italicize ref. Refs are a pain to work with.
• curprev 12:0312:03, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,129 bytes +9,244‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 12:0312:03, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,097 bytes +62‎ Try another reference referenced twice.
• curprev 11:5811:58, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,060 bytes +25‎ Add ref name here (MilesManomalousea)
• curprev 11:5611:56, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,035 bytes +31‎ Try "ref name" feature.
• curprev 11:4811:48, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 31,004 bytes +947‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 10:5810:58, 17 September 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 30,314 bytes +257‎ added a sentence, and footnote, about bubble fusion, cautioning that it is not the same as cold fusion

16 September 2008

• curprev 20:1720:17, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 30,057 bytes +8,065‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath: Well, I'm sure Rusi feels he has a grievance, but the info about him has absolutely no place in this article, so I have removed it
• curprev 15:5615:56, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 30,718 bytes −29‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 15:5315:53, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 30,750 bytes +3‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 15:4915:49, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 30,747 bytes 0‎ Meant NOW well understood, not NOT. This is what happens when you let the computer type for you, with voice input.
• curprev 15:2515:25, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 30,747 bytes +6‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 15:2015:20, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 30,741 bytes +8,749‎ →‎The Pons and Fleischmann announcement and its aftermath
• curprev 15:1415:14, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 30,649 bytes +8,657‎ You want history, you got it. Here is the tip of the iceburg.
• curprev 13:2613:26, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 21,992 bytes +107‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:2213:22, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 21,990 bytes 0‎ →‎Continuing research
• curprev 13:1913:19, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 21,990 bytes +105‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:1913:19, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 21,995 bytes +110‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:0513:05, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 21,885 bytes +21,885‎ →‎Experimental claims
• curprev 12:5912:59, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 21,883 bytes +119‎ →‎A clean, cheap source of energy?
• curprev 12:5712:57, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 21,880 bytes +190‎ ref taken from wikipedia
• curprev 12:4812:48, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 21,690 bytes +4‎ →‎The history of cold fusion before 1989
• curprev 12:4612:46, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 21,686 bytes −78‎ Delete LENR-CANR.org mention here. Maybe add below in "resources"?
• curprev 12:3712:37, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 21,764 bytes +3,913‎ →‎The history of cold fusion before 1989
• curprev 12:2312:23, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 21,681 bytes +3,815‎ →‎The history of cold fusion before Pons and Fleischmann
• curprev 10:5310:53, 16 September 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 17,764 bytes −115‎ minor rewriting to tighten

15 September 2008

• curprev 23:1123:11, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 17,779 bytes −225‎ Try again. Fold para 3 into para 1. It violates both known methods of producing fusion (brute force and neutral particles)
• curprev 23:0623:06, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 18,021 bytes +17‎ Coulomb barrier defined twice! Or thrice. Third paragraph modified.
• curprev 22:3422:34, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 18,013 bytes +9‎ Better put back "ordinary helium" before Ed finds out I deleted it!
• curprev 21:4021:40, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 18,004 bytes +125‎ Adding some placeholders for history sections
• curprev 20:0420:04, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 17,879 bytes +13‎ changed "done" to "conducted low-cost"
• curprev 20:0320:03, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 17,866 bytes +15‎ i think it looks better with the TOC in the upper right
• curprev 19:0419:04, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 17,851 bytes +744‎ →‎A clean, cheap source of energy?
• curprev 18:0718:07, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ m 17,852 bytes 0‎ Cold Fusion moved to Cold fusion: corrected article title as per CZ convention
• curprev 16:3716:37, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 17,852 bytes +238‎ Power density and temp are high so it is at least plausible source of energy, albeit not presently practical at all.
• curprev 16:3316:33, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ m 17,614 bytes +4‎ →‎Experimental claims
• curprev 16:1216:12, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 17,610 bytes +362‎ →‎Continuing research
• curprev 16:0416:04, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 17,248 bytes +141‎ More background on failed replications
• curprev 15:5915:59, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 17,043 bytes −81‎ Last sentence was a repetion from first para.
• curprev 15:5215:52, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 17,124 bytes 0‎ →‎Experimental Claims: reintroduce Ro's edit, not vandalism
• curprev 15:5215:52, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ m 17,124 bytes +15‎ No edit summary
• curprev 15:5015:50, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 17,108 bytes −1‎ rm comma
• curprev 15:4915:49, 15 September 2008‎ imported>Jed Rothwell‎ 17,109 bytes +2‎ Undo revision 100386429 by Ro Thorpe (Talk) This is vandalism and it is not allowed here.