Talk:Geochronology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nereo Preto
(Why is it so different?)
 
imported>Nereo Preto
(checklisted)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Geochronology
|                cat1 = Earth Sciences
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 10:13, 9 March 2007 (CST)
}}
As I post this article, I add also a clarification. The original article in WP was really about [[geochronometry]]. I know many Earth scientists do not like to distinguish between [[geochronology]] and [[geochronometry]] (and I am among them). But the latest edition of the International Stratigraphic guide has different definitions for these disciplines, thus, I decided to stick with the Guide. That's why this article is so different from its "parent".
As I post this article, I add also a clarification. The original article in WP was really about [[geochronometry]]. I know many Earth scientists do not like to distinguish between [[geochronology]] and [[geochronometry]] (and I am among them). But the latest edition of the International Stratigraphic guide has different definitions for these disciplines, thus, I decided to stick with the Guide. That's why this article is so different from its "parent".



Revision as of 11:13, 9 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Geochronology"
Workgroup category or categories Earth Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Nereo Preto 10:13, 9 March 2007 (CST)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






As I post this article, I add also a clarification. The original article in WP was really about geochronometry. I know many Earth scientists do not like to distinguish between geochronology and geochronometry (and I am among them). But the latest edition of the International Stratigraphic guide has different definitions for these disciplines, thus, I decided to stick with the Guide. That's why this article is so different from its "parent".

By the way, I am not totally satisfied with geochronometry. I wonder if someone could take a look and polish it...

Ciao, Nereo Preto 11:14, 14 November 2006 (CST)