Talk:Phrenology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (→Opening sentence: "mostly discredited", no?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Content== | |||
The article should describe the histoty of phrenology, its current situation, along with giving some details of how the system actually was supposed to work. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 14:21, 21 January 2007 (CST) | The article should describe the histoty of phrenology, its current situation, along with giving some details of how the system actually was supposed to work. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 14:21, 21 January 2007 (CST) | ||
==Opening sentence== | |||
Shouldn't the opening sentence say something like "Phrenology is the ''now mostly-discredited'' formal practice of assigning personality traits to individual people on the basis of the contour of their skulls and facial features."? I say "mostly" because there is the theory that one can sometimes tell something about the character of a person (especially an older person) from their face, but I thought the skull shape thing was pretty dead now. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 16:28, 14 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:28, 14 April 2008
|
| Metadata here |
Content
The article should describe the histoty of phrenology, its current situation, along with giving some details of how the system actually was supposed to work. Nancy Sculerati MD 14:21, 21 January 2007 (CST)
Opening sentence
Shouldn't the opening sentence say something like "Phrenology is the now mostly-discredited formal practice of assigning personality traits to individual people on the basis of the contour of their skulls and facial features."? I say "mostly" because there is the theory that one can sometimes tell something about the character of a person (especially an older person) from their face, but I thought the skull shape thing was pretty dead now. J. Noel Chiappa 16:28, 14 April 2008 (CDT)