Talk:Horizontal gene transfer/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>David Tribe |
imported>David Tribe |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
It would be good if someone would clarify this: ''"Microorganisms appear to be most affected by HGT, but even in microbes only about 2% of core genes are transferred laterally."'' Per generation? Per year? Per lifetime of the planet? Is there a particular 2% of the genome which is frequently exchanged laterally, while the rest of the genome never is? Or is there 2% which was exchanged laterally at some time in the past, while the rest never was? How does this square with the theory mentioned in the [[life]] article about HGT having been very common before the Darwinian threshold? --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 22:14, 28 April 2007 (CDT) | It would be good if someone would clarify this: ''"Microorganisms appear to be most affected by HGT, but even in microbes only about 2% of core genes are transferred laterally."'' Per generation? Per year? Per lifetime of the planet? Is there a particular 2% of the genome which is frequently exchanged laterally, while the rest of the genome never is? Or is there 2% which was exchanged laterally at some time in the past, while the rest never was? How does this square with the theory mentioned in the [[life]] article about HGT having been very common before the Darwinian threshold? --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 22:14, 28 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:: It not | :: It not 2% per time. It 2% of the total number genes. But to address the point, one can add 2% can be identified or similar qualification. [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 04:44, 29 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:44, 29 April 2007
Bug?
There is a strange printing bug with this page. It views normally on the Firefox browser but only prints the introduction on my system. Prints OK with IE 7 though. Possibly there is a size limit issue? David Tribe 04:24, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Glitch not present on another system. May be just my Adobe software. David Tribe 19:45, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Spelling and Grammar
I corrected a number of spelling errors and grammatical "errors" in the article. Someone should check that all the changes I made are genuinely corrections. In particular someone should check that the term "even genes for SSU rRNA's" was not intentional. I reverted one change that I made to the spelling of archeal (from archaeal) since I presume it can be spelled either way.
Sadly the other errors also occur in the approved version of the article.
Found a number of minor errors, awkwardnesses, and tried to get citation style right? Hope I got it right David? Its a long and tough article and I'll go through it again. I removed some excess wikilinksand one duplicated reference. Its a very good article and glitches are hard to eliminate completely. Are you happy with the reference appearance? ... I'm not, butI cant see the rule that connects links and spaces so cant get things consistent.... Doooh Gareth Leng 17:22, 18 February 2007 (CST)
OK I've gone through it all again now, and taken out a couple of references that duplicated citations. Found a few typos and altered a number of phrases that I thought could be rendered more clearly. Done my best to make the references look clean. Reduced wikilinks by linking only to first mention.Gareth Leng 04:18, 20 February 2007 (CST)
APPROVED Version 1.1
2% per how often?
It would be good if someone would clarify this: "Microorganisms appear to be most affected by HGT, but even in microbes only about 2% of core genes are transferred laterally." Per generation? Per year? Per lifetime of the planet? Is there a particular 2% of the genome which is frequently exchanged laterally, while the rest of the genome never is? Or is there 2% which was exchanged laterally at some time in the past, while the rest never was? How does this square with the theory mentioned in the life article about HGT having been very common before the Darwinian threshold? --Catherine Woodgold 22:14, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
- It not 2% per time. It 2% of the total number genes. But to address the point, one can add 2% can be identified or similar qualification. David Tribe 04:44, 29 April 2007 (CDT)