Talk:Body text: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Paul Derry No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there really enough meat about the notion of "body text" in HTML to warrant a whole article? Also, the title, "body text," is too vague. Perhaps: [[body text (HTML)]] or [[body (HTML)]]. But first there needs to be a plan for what the full set of HTML articles will look like. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:43, 29 January 2007 (CST) | Is there really enough meat about the notion of "body text" in HTML to warrant a whole article? Also, the title, "body text," is too vague. Perhaps: [[body text (HTML)]] or [[body (HTML)]]. But first there needs to be a plan for what the full set of HTML articles will look like. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:43, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Body text could be expanded somewhat into a broader context such as typesetting, newspaper, etc. The HTML and XHTML articles could be amended to include some of the available formatting features, a simple picture that indicates how they're arranged on a page would be nice and informative. | |||
--[[User:Paul Derry|Paul Derry]] 17:13, 15 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:13, 15 February 2007
Is there really enough meat about the notion of "body text" in HTML to warrant a whole article? Also, the title, "body text," is too vague. Perhaps: body text (HTML) or body (HTML). But first there needs to be a plan for what the full set of HTML articles will look like. --Larry Sanger 00:43, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Body text could be expanded somewhat into a broader context such as typesetting, newspaper, etc. The HTML and XHTML articles could be amended to include some of the available formatting features, a simple picture that indicates how they're arranged on a page would be nice and informative. --Paul Derry 17:13, 15 February 2007 (CST)