Talk:HTML: Difference between revisions
imported>Pat Palmer (category check OK) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (→Possible image?: new section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| Line 26: | Line 17: | ||
==needs a ton of work== | ==needs a ton of work== | ||
It especially needs references.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 14:13, 23 April 2007 (CDT) | It especially needs references.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 14:13, 23 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Bot Suggested Topics== | |||
Someone needs to take a look at the remaining Bot-suggested topics at the bottom of the Related Articles page. I moved up a bunch of links that struck me as related (although even a couple of them are iffy) but my own preference would be to delete the others. | |||
[[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] 20:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Possible image? == | |||
Not sure whether [http://www.flickr.com/photos/luchoedu/2452451031/ this] really fits in here, but it is certainly illustrative. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 01:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:39, 4 March 2010
title needs revising
Shouldn't this be titled HTML? Nancy Sculerati MD 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST)
actually, Nancy I am also so inclined. Robert Tito 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST)
I agree, it's usually all caps. --Larry Sanger 00:41, 29 January 2007 (CST)
For what it's worth, I concur as well. I'll move it tomorrow if I hear no objections. -- ZachPruckowski 02:16, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Article Organization
We need to arrive at some form of article organization. We should at least try to list what sections we would like to have in the article -- ZachPruckowski 02:16, 29 January 2007 (CST)
needs a ton of work
It especially needs references.Pat Palmer 14:13, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Bot Suggested Topics
Someone needs to take a look at the remaining Bot-suggested topics at the bottom of the Related Articles page. I moved up a bunch of links that struck me as related (although even a couple of them are iffy) but my own preference would be to delete the others. Roger Lohmann 20:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Possible image?
Not sure whether this really fits in here, but it is certainly illustrative. --Daniel Mietchen 01:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)