User:Kevin M I Schutte: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Tribe
No edit summary
 
imported>Kevin M I Schutte
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
n March of 2007, I completed a Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy at the University of California, Santa Barbara, opting not to apply for Ph.D. candidacy in the program, and I am pursuing employment (for now) outside academia.  My undergraduate work was done at California State University, Sacramento where in 2003 I earned a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy with concentrations in (i) Logic and Philosophy of Science and (ii) Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Law.  My interests and superficial knowledge span most areas of analytic philosophy (and postanalytic philosophy, to whatever degree there is such a thing).  Most of my in-depth research has been devoted to whether and how it is possible to extend a version of Crispin Wright's minimalist account of normative discourse involving truth to normative discourse involving the good (rather than, as Wright prefers, to normative discourse involving truth about the good).  As a result, I read mostly the work of minimalists, anti-realists, deflationary theorists, instrumentalists, mathematical intuitionists, nominalists/conceptualists, and skeptics (just to name a few), and I try to keep apprised of the wide variety of emerging viewpoints in metaethics.
In March of 2007, I completed a Master of Arts Degree in [[Philosophy]] at the [[University of California, Santa Barbara]], opting not to apply for Ph.D. candidacy in the program, and I am pursuing employment (for now) outside academia.  My undergraduate work was done at [[California State University, Sacramento]] where in 2003 I earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Philosophy with concentrations in (i) [[Logic]] and [[Philosophy of Science]] and (ii) [[Applied Ethics]] and [[Philosophy of Law]].  My interests and superficial knowledge span most areas of [[analytic philosophy]] (and postanalytic philosophy, to whatever degree there is such a thing).  Most of my in-depth research has been devoted to whether and how it is possible to extend a version of [[Crispin Wright]]'s minimalist account of [[normativity|normative]] discourse involving [[truth]] to normative discourse involving the good (rather than, as Wright prefers, to normative discourse involving ''truth about the'' good).  Specifically, I am interested in whether a [[William Wollaston|Wollastonian]] could make use of a notion of superpermissibility (analogous to Wright's notion of superassertibility).  As a result, I read mostly the work of [[minimalism|minimalists]], [[anti-realism|anti-realists]], [[deflationary theory|deflationary theorists]], [[instrumentalism|instrumentalists]], [[intuitionism|mathematical intuitionists]], [[nominalism|nominalists]]/[[conceptualism|conceptualists]], and [[skepticism|skeptics]] (just to name a few), and I try to keep apprised of the wide variety of emerging viewpoints in [[metaethics]].
 
[[Category:Philosophy Authors|Schutte, Kevin M I]]

Revision as of 17:27, 8 April 2007

In March of 2007, I completed a Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy at the University of California, Santa Barbara, opting not to apply for Ph.D. candidacy in the program, and I am pursuing employment (for now) outside academia. My undergraduate work was done at California State University, Sacramento where in 2003 I earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Philosophy with concentrations in (i) Logic and Philosophy of Science and (ii) Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Law. My interests and superficial knowledge span most areas of analytic philosophy (and postanalytic philosophy, to whatever degree there is such a thing). Most of my in-depth research has been devoted to whether and how it is possible to extend a version of Crispin Wright's minimalist account of normative discourse involving truth to normative discourse involving the good (rather than, as Wright prefers, to normative discourse involving truth about the good). Specifically, I am interested in whether a Wollastonian could make use of a notion of superpermissibility (analogous to Wright's notion of superassertibility). As a result, I read mostly the work of minimalists, anti-realists, deflationary theorists, instrumentalists, mathematical intuitionists, nominalists/conceptualists, and skeptics (just to name a few), and I try to keep apprised of the wide variety of emerging viewpoints in metaethics.