Talk:Pilus: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos
(a hint)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Pilus
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 12:50, 16 March 2007 (CDT)
}}


==Wikipedia content==
==Wikipedia content==
For what it is worth... The capture of the second image seems to come from Wikipedia. Maybe it can be reworked and improved? While its weight (as compared to the size of the article) seems of little importance, it is a piece of text that one focuses on. In view of some recent criticism that CZ copies Wikipedia without giving proper credits, wouldn't it be good to make clear that the article is completely new? --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 12:39, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
For what it is worth... The capture of the second image seems to come from Wikipedia. Maybe it can be reworked and improved? While its weight (as compared to the size of the article) seems of little importance, it is a piece of text that one focuses on. In view of some recent criticism that CZ copies Wikipedia without giving proper credits, wouldn't it be good to make clear that the article is completely new? --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 12:39, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 15:40, 12 November 2007

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Hairlike appendage found on the surface of many Gram-negative bacteria, shorter, thinner and straighter than flagella. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Biology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Wikipedia content

For what it is worth... The capture of the second image seems to come from Wikipedia. Maybe it can be reworked and improved? While its weight (as compared to the size of the article) seems of little importance, it is a piece of text that one focuses on. In view of some recent criticism that CZ copies Wikipedia without giving proper credits, wouldn't it be good to make clear that the article is completely new? --AlekStos 12:39, 29 March 2007 (CDT)