Talk:Pronoun: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard Arvi Hughes
(checklist)
 
imported>Russell Potter
(Issues)
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 07:46, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 07:46, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
== Issues ==
This and other entries need to be very carefully written.  There are multiple models within linguistics, and the traditional "parts of speech" notion still taught in elementary schools in the US is simply not used by linguists any more.  We'd need to talk about functional linguistics, and may want to consider using "word classes" instead of parts of speech.  English itself is also a very anomalous language in many respects, and we need to qualify any statements here that refer to issues specific to English, as opposed to structures common to larger language families, or language as a whole.
I hope linguists here on CZ will be conscious of these issues; I wouldn't want to see a bunch of new entries that don't take account of them.  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 08:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 07:29, 18 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Pronoun"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Versuri 07:46, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Issues

This and other entries need to be very carefully written. There are multiple models within linguistics, and the traditional "parts of speech" notion still taught in elementary schools in the US is simply not used by linguists any more. We'd need to talk about functional linguistics, and may want to consider using "word classes" instead of parts of speech. English itself is also a very anomalous language in many respects, and we need to qualify any statements here that refer to issues specific to English, as opposed to structures common to larger language families, or language as a whole.

I hope linguists here on CZ will be conscious of these issues; I wouldn't want to see a bunch of new entries that don't take account of them. Russell Potter 08:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)