Talk:Assignment Zero: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I approve! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:30, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | I approve! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:30, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Then by Sanger's Grace it will begin tomorrow. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 21:35, 24 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:35, 24 April 2007
I can tackle this. --Robert W King 15:47, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
Sounds great! (If you're not actually working on AZ yourself.) --Larry Sanger 15:51, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
- Whoops, nevermind then!--Robert W King 15:51, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
- Wait, do you mean if I'm working for the Assignment Zero staff as in one of them who runs the project or if I'm a contributor?
Actually, I think there's a difference between staff and rank-and-file contributor. If you're the latter, I guess that's OK. After all, we want to have an article about CZ, but the Policy on Self-Promotion forbids me from working on it. Who could work on it, then? The rank-and-file, anyway. --Larry Sanger 16:02, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
- My question is who could approve a CZ article. :-) ---Stephen Ewen 17:43, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
- I suppose that as long as I'm documenting the project as it is, and not praising or criticizing it(keeping neutral) then it should be okay. I have no special interests in the way AZ is run as I'm not there to make it a success or not--I don't pull those strings. If you approve, then I'll create the article.--Robert W King 16:10, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
I approve! --Larry Sanger 17:30, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
- Then by Sanger's Grace it will begin tomorrow. --Robert W King 21:35, 24 April 2007 (CDT)