Talk:Sexually transmitted disease: Difference between revisions
imported>Michael Hardy |
imported>David Martin No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Sexually transmitted disease | |||
| cat1 = Biology | |||
| cat2 = Health Sciences | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = N | |||
| status = 2 | |||
| underlinked = Y | |||
| cleanup = Y | |||
| by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 21:47, 15 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
==Images== | ==Images== | ||
This is an article that I think should have (adequately cropped) images. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 12:46, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | This is an article that I think should have (adequately cropped) images. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 12:46, 3 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:47, 15 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup, Health Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | David Martin 21:47, 15 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Images
This is an article that I think should have (adequately cropped) images. Stephen Ewen 12:46, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
- it's still basically a stub, along with today's other addtions, so we'll work on it.--Peter A. Lipson 13:01, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
As you know, I am a proponent of medical articles that provide patient information- but this article, in its present undeveloped state, reads like a patient hand-out rather than an encyclopedia entry. Ideally, it should be aimed at an audience that includes patients, but also physicians, nurses, other health scientists and somebody "doing a report" on STD. How can we work together to fix this? Nancy Sculerati 09:53, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
- I basically uploaded it as a stub to be filled in or entirely redone. Basically, just a 10% framework sort of thing as a placeholder. We can start by adding the correct headings and subheadings and filling them in....Peter A. Lipson 12:29, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
Can't we use the term, "venereal disease" as well? Nancy Sculerati 17:16, 4 May 2007 (CDT) I think we are better off starting from scratch. I, at least, can't do much with this.Nancy Sculerati 18:04, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Health Sciences External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Health Sciences Cleanup
- Cleanup