Talk:Proto-Indo-European language: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bruce M. Tindall (big cleanup) |
imported>Brian P. Long (→rename?: new section) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
| | == indo == | ||
| | according to me the two indo germanic languages are called Indo-Germane languages as a group [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:black"> <font color="yellow"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 17:51, 5 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Slavic languages should be mentioned== | |||
Slavic languages is an important large, distinct branch of Indo European languages and should hence be mentioned. [[User:Andries Krugers Dagneaux|Andries]] | |||
== rename? == | |||
If anyone is watching this, might we not want to move this article to [[Proto-Indo-European (language)]]? With appropriate redirects, of course... Thanks, [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 19:27, 22 April 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 18:27, 22 April 2008
indo
according to me the two indo germanic languages are called Indo-Germane languages as a group Robert Tito | Talk 17:51, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
Slavic languages should be mentioned
Slavic languages is an important large, distinct branch of Indo European languages and should hence be mentioned. Andries
rename?
If anyone is watching this, might we not want to move this article to Proto-Indo-European (language)? With appropriate redirects, of course... Thanks, Brian P. Long 19:27, 22 April 2008 (CDT)