Talk:Fundamental Theorem of Algebra: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer (→W.l.o.g.: new section) |
imported>Jitse Niesen (→W.l.o.g.: reply) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
What does this mean?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 21:12, 13 March 2008 (CDT) | What does this mean?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 21:12, 13 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
: Also "counting multiplicity" - I'm guessing that it means that Tp=Tq (e.g. in (x + 2)(x + 2)), but you ought to say that explicitly. Other than that, great intro - crystal clear. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 09:59, 14 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
:: I think W.l.o.g. means "without loss of generality" and I don't see any connection with multiplicity of roots. You and I differing on intepretation, I wouldn't call the article crystal clear.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:42, 14 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
::: Umm, I just meant the ''intro'' was crystal clear. And my mention of "counting multiplicity" was in the sense of "what does this mean" - i.e. the article needs to be changed to make it clear. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 13:53, 14 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
:::: Wlog is indeed "without loss of generality". I think it's bad style to use this abbreviation (even though people that know about homotopy groups probably know this abbreviation) so I wrote it out. | |||
:::: "Counting multiplicity" means what is says in the formula above that phrase. For instance, the quadratic polynomial <math> x^2 - 2x + 1 </math> is only zero at <math>x=1</math>, but this is a double root because <math> x^2 - 2x + 1 = (x-1)^2</math>. So this root counts for two if we count roots with their multiplicities. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 11:26, 15 March 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 10:26, 15 March 2008
just started the article
This is some material that used to be in the complex number article, but I felt an entire article on the fundamental theorem of algebra would be the better place for it. However all I did was cut and paste from there to here, so this article doesn't have a good structure yet. Feel free to attack it! - Greg Martin 18:54, 29 April 2007 (CDT); clarified by Jitse Niesen 02:35, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
W.l.o.g.
What does this mean?--Paul Wormer 21:12, 13 March 2008 (CDT)
- Also "counting multiplicity" - I'm guessing that it means that Tp=Tq (e.g. in (x + 2)(x + 2)), but you ought to say that explicitly. Other than that, great intro - crystal clear. J. Noel Chiappa 09:59, 14 March 2008 (CDT)
- I think W.l.o.g. means "without loss of generality" and I don't see any connection with multiplicity of roots. You and I differing on intepretation, I wouldn't call the article crystal clear.--Paul Wormer 10:42, 14 March 2008 (CDT)
- Umm, I just meant the intro was crystal clear. And my mention of "counting multiplicity" was in the sense of "what does this mean" - i.e. the article needs to be changed to make it clear. J. Noel Chiappa 13:53, 14 March 2008 (CDT)
- Wlog is indeed "without loss of generality". I think it's bad style to use this abbreviation (even though people that know about homotopy groups probably know this abbreviation) so I wrote it out.
- "Counting multiplicity" means what is says in the formula above that phrase. For instance, the quadratic polynomial is only zero at , but this is a double root because . So this root counts for two if we count roots with their multiplicities. -- Jitse Niesen 11:26, 15 March 2008 (CDT)