Talk:Archive:Monthly Write-a-Thon/May 7, 2008: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I can't find it to save my life now, but I believe when I signed up I read something about keeping stubs to a minimum of about 150 words. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 09:52, 31 July 2007 (CDT) | : I can't find it to save my life now, but I believe when I signed up I read something about keeping stubs to a minimum of about 150 words. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 09:52, 31 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Well, strictly speaking, anything under 50 words is deletable. That doesn't mean anything over 50 words is OK, though. As a rule of thumb, I would say 150-250 is a good minimum, depending on the topic, but it could perhaps be even less. [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1094.0.html See this discussion for | Well, strictly speaking, anything under 50 words is deletable. That doesn't mean anything over 50 words is OK, though. As a rule of thumb, I would say 150-250 is a good minimum, depending on the topic, but it could perhaps be even less. [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1094.0.html See this discussion for very relevant discussion.] (That might be what you saw, Todd.) Generally, we want a stub to contain a ''good'' definition at the very least, as well as some other solid information, and the whole thing should more or less stand alone. You might also see [http://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_perfect_stub_article The perfect stub article,] which I wrote back in the early days of Wikipedia. Note that we don't identify stubs as stubs on articles, on CZ. That's a practice I've come to think is ultimately harmful. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:57, 31 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:57, 31 July 2007
How short is too short for a stub? Can I write a latin phrase used in medicine and give 2 or 3 sentences about it, then give the british and english pronunciation? Then link articles relating to this? Tom Kelly 09:33, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
- I can't find it to save my life now, but I believe when I signed up I read something about keeping stubs to a minimum of about 150 words. --Todd Coles 09:52, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
Well, strictly speaking, anything under 50 words is deletable. That doesn't mean anything over 50 words is OK, though. As a rule of thumb, I would say 150-250 is a good minimum, depending on the topic, but it could perhaps be even less. See this discussion for very relevant discussion. (That might be what you saw, Todd.) Generally, we want a stub to contain a good definition at the very least, as well as some other solid information, and the whole thing should more or less stand alone. You might also see The perfect stub article, which I wrote back in the early days of Wikipedia. Note that we don't identify stubs as stubs on articles, on CZ. That's a practice I've come to think is ultimately harmful. --Larry Sanger 09:57, 31 July 2007 (CDT)