Talk:Astrology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>James Davis
imported>James Davis
(checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
{{checklist
|                abc = Astrology
|                cat1 = Religion
|                cat2 = Mythology
|                cat3 = Astronomy
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = no
|            cleanup = yes
|                  by = [[User:James Davis|James Davis]] 14:38, 13 November 2007 (CST)
}}


==General==
==General==

Revision as of 14:38, 13 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Any belief that correlates the patterns and positions of celestial bodies to human personalities, human affairs, or terrestrial events. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Pseudoscience
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English


Article Checklist for "Astrology"
Workgroup category or categories Religion Workgroup, Mythology Workgroup, Astronomy Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by James Davis 14:38, 13 November 2007 (CST)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





General

I attempt to write an introduction that attempt to the origin of astrology, your initial proeminency and, after, your fall in descredit. It is necessary still write mor about astrology itself, your structure and different branches. --L'Astorina 13:26, 02 October 2007 (CST)

Hi Astorina, I've fixed some but not all of the language problems with the article. I take it, that English is not your native language?
In many places, the wording and sentence structure are not clear. If you are still active on this article, leave me a note here, and I will suggest more extensive changes and development of the article. James Davis 20:29, 29 October 2007 (CDT)

Note: A month having passed since my inquiry above, and having had no word from Astorina, I've done a complete rewrite of the article. I had hoped to seek some clarification of the obscure language in the original version so that I could build on it rather than rewrite. But Astornai did not respond so I've made a fresh start. James Davis 14:35, 13 November 2007 (CST)