Talk:Gunpowder: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Explaining my editing of the lede: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Explaining my editing of the lede == | |||
Howard, I felt that the first sentence should include a parenthetical explanation that "gunpowder" includes "black powder" and "smokeless powder" because they were both mentioned a bit further into the lede without explaining that that they were sub-classes of gunpowder. | |||
I also deleted the use of gunpowder in rocket motors because I assume you were referring to the very ancient use in rockets by the Chinese and others ... readers might assume that gunpowder was used as a propellant in modern rocket motors. | |||
Other than that, I think the rest of my edits are self-explanatory. I hope that what I have done is useful. | |||
One other point, I really don't like linking of words in a section to the following sub-sections of the that same section, as you have done with [[#black powder|black]] and [[#smokeless powder|smokeless powder]]. The reader can see the subsections a few sentences later quite easily without needing the linking. However, that is simply a preference of mine that I don't feel too strongly about. Regards, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:48, 26 April 2010
Explaining my editing of the lede
Howard, I felt that the first sentence should include a parenthetical explanation that "gunpowder" includes "black powder" and "smokeless powder" because they were both mentioned a bit further into the lede without explaining that that they were sub-classes of gunpowder.
I also deleted the use of gunpowder in rocket motors because I assume you were referring to the very ancient use in rockets by the Chinese and others ... readers might assume that gunpowder was used as a propellant in modern rocket motors.
Other than that, I think the rest of my edits are self-explanatory. I hope that what I have done is useful.
One other point, I really don't like linking of words in a section to the following sub-sections of the that same section, as you have done with black and smokeless powder. The reader can see the subsections a few sentences later quite easily without needing the linking. However, that is simply a preference of mine that I don't feel too strongly about. Regards, Milton Beychok 22:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Military Developing Articles
- Military Nonstub Articles
- Military Internal Articles
- Chemistry Developing Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Military Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Chemistry Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Military tag
- History tag
- Chemical Engineering tag