User talk:Warren Schudy: Difference between revisions
imported>Pat Palmer (thanks for helping out on Core Articles) |
imported>John Stephenson (NoResponse template (may be an email problem) - user may remove this at any time) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{NoResponse}} | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
==nice job on the Core Articles!== | ==nice job on the Core Articles!== | ||
Hey thanks for beating our [[CZ:Core_Articles/Applied_Arts_and_Sciences#Computers_-_Stage_2]] into shape![[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:58, 9 January 2008 (CST) | Hey thanks for beating our [[CZ:Core_Articles/Applied_Arts_and_Sciences#Computers_-_Stage_2]] into shape![[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:58, 9 January 2008 (CST) | ||
:Warren, I finally had time today to look over the list. I made one change, reversing the positions of RAM (which you had given 10 points) with "virtual memory". So VM would be (in my scheme of things) worth 10 points, and RAM nothing. This is all a matter of opinion. I edited a little on what was just a stub for virtual memory to try and illustrate why I think it's so important. When you have time, you might take a look and lemme know what you think.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:28, 16 January 2008 (CST) | |||
::You RAM idea is OK with me. Go for it.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 05:08, 17 January 2008 (CST) | |||
== Proposal moved == | |||
See [[CZ:Proposals/Approval_and_Feedback]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:10, 13 February 2008 (CST) | |||
== e & E == | |||
Hi, Warren, I intend to make (not just now) a page about the letter E. That'll mean modifying the name of the existing [[e]] article, which you've been editing. I suggest [[e (number)]] or [[e (mathematics)]]: what do you say? Cheers - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 13:13, 29 February 2008 (CST) | |||
I suggested "e (exponential base)" on the talk page. Any thoughts? [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 13:28, 29 February 2008 (CST) | |||
== Your proposal to enable external feedback == | |||
Hello. The proposal record for "[[CZ:Proposals/Enable external feedback|Enable external feedback]]", for which you are listed as driver, says that the current step (to prepare specification for help-wanted ad on MediaWiki) was due to be completed 3 March. Could you please update the proposal record on [[CZ:Proposals/Approval and Feedback]], changing your self-imposed deadline and perhaps the next step? If you're merely waiting for the Approval and Feedback group to get their act together, say so (and prod them along). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. -- The Proposals Manager, [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 09:51, 6 March 2008 (CST) | |||
== Restart of proposal system == | |||
Hello. Due to a lack of activity and attention on my part, the Proposal System has ground to a halt and discussion on all proposals has stopped. I decided to clean out the system by marking all proposals as inactive and removing their drivers. This also happened to your proposal [[CZ:Proposals/Involving authors in approvals|"Involving authors in approvals"]] and [[CZ:Proposals/Enable external feedback|"Enable external feedback"]]. I would be delighted if you decide that you want to take one or both proposals up again. You can do this by updating the proposal record(s), which can now be found at [[CZ:Proposals/Driverless]]. Please do not hesitate to ask if anything is unclear. Yours, [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 22:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC) (Proposals Manager) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:47, 10 February 2021
| *Their registered email address is no longer working (or is rejecting Citizendium mail); |
| *The account has been closed; |
| *The user is otherwise inactive on the wiki. |
welcome
Warren, Just wanted to say hi and thanks for contributing to the Computers workgroup.Pat Palmer 18:04, 6 January 2008 (CST)
nice job on the Core Articles!
Hey thanks for beating our CZ:Core_Articles/Applied_Arts_and_Sciences#Computers_-_Stage_2 into shape!Pat Palmer 21:58, 9 January 2008 (CST)
- Warren, I finally had time today to look over the list. I made one change, reversing the positions of RAM (which you had given 10 points) with "virtual memory". So VM would be (in my scheme of things) worth 10 points, and RAM nothing. This is all a matter of opinion. I edited a little on what was just a stub for virtual memory to try and illustrate why I think it's so important. When you have time, you might take a look and lemme know what you think.Pat Palmer 21:28, 16 January 2008 (CST)
- You RAM idea is OK with me. Go for it.Pat Palmer 05:08, 17 January 2008 (CST)
Proposal moved
See CZ:Proposals/Approval_and_Feedback. --Larry Sanger 16:10, 13 February 2008 (CST)
e & E
Hi, Warren, I intend to make (not just now) a page about the letter E. That'll mean modifying the name of the existing e article, which you've been editing. I suggest e (number) or e (mathematics): what do you say? Cheers - Ro Thorpe 13:13, 29 February 2008 (CST)
I suggested "e (exponential base)" on the talk page. Any thoughts? David E. Volk 13:28, 29 February 2008 (CST)
Your proposal to enable external feedback
Hello. The proposal record for "Enable external feedback", for which you are listed as driver, says that the current step (to prepare specification for help-wanted ad on MediaWiki) was due to be completed 3 March. Could you please update the proposal record on CZ:Proposals/Approval and Feedback, changing your self-imposed deadline and perhaps the next step? If you're merely waiting for the Approval and Feedback group to get their act together, say so (and prod them along). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. -- The Proposals Manager, Jitse Niesen 09:51, 6 March 2008 (CST)
Restart of proposal system
Hello. Due to a lack of activity and attention on my part, the Proposal System has ground to a halt and discussion on all proposals has stopped. I decided to clean out the system by marking all proposals as inactive and removing their drivers. This also happened to your proposal "Involving authors in approvals" and "Enable external feedback". I would be delighted if you decide that you want to take one or both proposals up again. You can do this by updating the proposal record(s), which can now be found at CZ:Proposals/Driverless. Please do not hesitate to ask if anything is unclear. Yours, Jitse Niesen 22:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC) (Proposals Manager)