Talk:Graydidascalus brachyurus (Short-tailed Parrot): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anton Sweeney
(Move?)
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


Any objection to moving this article to "Short-tailed parrot"? (The abc metadata is currently empty - will leave it till a move (or not) is decided.) [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 16:50, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
Any objection to moving this article to "Short-tailed parrot"? (The abc metadata is currently empty - will leave it till a move (or not) is decided.) [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 16:50, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
Yes, check out other articles about species, they are mostly under the scientific name, except very well know species. [[User:Kim van der Linde|Kim van der Linde]] 16:01, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
I like this as a suggestion of what the biology naming convention should be.  It places the (precise) scientific name first, which keeps biologists happy.  But it includes a user-friendly common English name of the species in the title, which increases findability.  I think this is an excellent compromise. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:35, 23 October 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 11:35, 23 October 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Only species of the genus Graydidascalus, found along both banks of the Amazon river and other major Amazonian rivers in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology and TOL [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Move?

Any objection to moving this article to "Short-tailed parrot"? (The abc metadata is currently empty - will leave it till a move (or not) is decided.) Anton Sweeney 16:50, 22 September 2007 (CDT) Yes, check out other articles about species, they are mostly under the scientific name, except very well know species. Kim van der Linde 16:01, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

I like this as a suggestion of what the biology naming convention should be. It places the (precise) scientific name first, which keeps biologists happy. But it includes a user-friendly common English name of the species in the title, which increases findability. I think this is an excellent compromise. --Larry Sanger 12:35, 23 October 2007 (CDT)