Talk:Reagan Doctrine: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe (→Title) |
imported>Jonathan Beshears No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST) | Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:Thanks - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST) | :Thanks - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST) | ||
==Citations== | |||
I'm not going to pull a wikipedia and put fact tags everywhere, but I think we need more citations in the article. [[User:Jonathan Beshears|Jonathan Beshears]] 13:46, 17 February 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 13:46, 17 February 2008
This article, since it will be in American English (as it concerns an American topic), should be copyedited accordingly.
I also spot some neutrality issues, which I leave to the reader to find... --Larry Sanger 12:49, 6 December 2007 (CST)
Cut and change as you see fit. Denis Cavanagh 13:04, 6 December 2007 (CST)
Title
Shouldn't it be moved to Reagan Doctrine? Hayford Peirce 10:52, 17 February 2008 (CST)
Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. Denis Cavanagh 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST)
- Thanks - Ro Thorpe 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST)
Citations
I'm not going to pull a wikipedia and put fact tags everywhere, but I think we need more citations in the article. Jonathan Beshears 13:46, 17 February 2008 (CST)