Phosphorus/Approval: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>D. Matt Innis (version updates with copyedits and a reference) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{Approval | |||
| cat1 = Chemistry | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
<!--required for ToApprove template--> | |||
| article url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Phosphorus&oldid=100278869 | |||
| subpage url = | |||
| cluster = | |||
| now = 13:36, 3 March 2008 (CST) | |||
| ToA editor = Milton Beychok | |||
| ToA editor2 = David E. Volk | |||
| ToA editor3 = Paul Wormer | |||
| date = March 10, 2008 | |||
<!--required for Approved template--> | |||
| A editor = | |||
| A editor2 = | |||
| A editor3 = | |||
}} | |||
==Approval version 1.1== | |||
There were some copyedits to the article and an approving editor has asked that these changes be included. | |||
[[CZ:Approval Process]] | |||
Addendum: after approval, copyediting may be performed by a nominating editor with the help of the approvals editor. This may occur at any time. (The reason for this rule is that sometimes, even when the article has been religiously scanned for mistakes by many eyes, even a seemingly-obvious mistake - like, say "1-1=2" instead of "1+1=2" - is missed. That sort of error does not require a new approval process to correct.) | |||
[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 23:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:43, 3 January 2009
| Milton Beychok nominated the version dated 13:36, 3 March 2008 (CST) of this article for approval. Two other editors supported the approval (David E. Volk and Paul Wormer). The Chemistry Workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, March 10, 2008. |
Approval version 1.1
There were some copyedits to the article and an approving editor has asked that these changes be included.
CZ:Approval Process Addendum: after approval, copyediting may be performed by a nominating editor with the help of the approvals editor. This may occur at any time. (The reason for this rule is that sometimes, even when the article has been religiously scanned for mistakes by many eyes, even a seemingly-obvious mistake - like, say "1-1=2" instead of "1+1=2" - is missed. That sort of error does not require a new approval process to correct.) D. Matt Innis 23:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)