Talk:V (letter): Difference between revisions
imported>Ro Thorpe |
imported>Ro Thorpe |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:I think we should have just one article on [[Roman numerals]]. It doesn't make any sense to create seperate articles for "M", "C", "X", "V", "I", "L", "Q". --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:06, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | :I think we should have just one article on [[Roman numerals]]. It doesn't make any sense to create seperate articles for "M", "C", "X", "V", "I", "L", "Q". --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:06, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Right, I' | Right, I'll make adjustments accordingly. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 11:08, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:08, 1 April 2008
Roman numerals
Should we disambiguate pages like this given they could also be Roman numerals? C, D, I, M and I would also need these. John Stephenson 03:08, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
The Roman numerals would go fine in the intro. However, I think we really need two articles here, as what you have added is about the sound. A separate article on /v/ (sound) with a link from the letter article? (I tried putting the phonetic square brackets in there but it didn't work, so I substituted the phonemic //). Ro Thorpe 08:54, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- OK, maybe /v/ (phoneme) would be better. John Stephenson 09:03, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
Yes, fine. Ro Thorpe 09:28, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- See V (disambiguation). --Robert W King 09:35, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
So are we going to have articles on the Roman numerals or just mention them in the introductions to the ones I started? Ro Thorpe 10:59, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- I think we should have just one article on Roman numerals. It doesn't make any sense to create seperate articles for "M", "C", "X", "V", "I", "L", "Q". --Robert W King 11:06, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
Right, I'll make adjustments accordingly. Ro Thorpe 11:08, 1 April 2008 (CDT)