Talk:Greek mythology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick m (subpages) |
imported>Robert M. Cutler No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
With a scholarly article like this, I think it's particularly important that you give the sources, e.g., Hesiod, right? That is, it is an important aspect of the topic itself of Greek mythology ''how we now know'' about these myths. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:11, 20 January 2008 (CST) | With a scholarly article like this, I think it's particularly important that you give the sources, e.g., Hesiod, right? That is, it is an important aspect of the topic itself of Greek mythology ''how we now know'' about these myths. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:11, 20 January 2008 (CST) | ||
::Strongly agreed. Also to be noted is that the Graves retelling (mentioned in the bibliography, is any material from there?) is a kind of compendium with variants in footnotes. I've encountered the critical opinion that it is a good retelling but sometimes imaginative so far as the historicity of identified geographic locales is concerned, but cannot evaluate that opinion. [[User:Robert M. Cutler|Robert M. Cutler]] 11:40, 27 January 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 11:40, 27 January 2008
With a scholarly article like this, I think it's particularly important that you give the sources, e.g., Hesiod, right? That is, it is an important aspect of the topic itself of Greek mythology how we now know about these myths. --Larry Sanger 21:11, 20 January 2008 (CST)
- Strongly agreed. Also to be noted is that the Graves retelling (mentioned in the bibliography, is any material from there?) is a kind of compendium with variants in footnotes. I've encountered the critical opinion that it is a good retelling but sometimes imaginative so far as the historicity of identified geographic locales is concerned, but cannot evaluate that opinion. Robert M. Cutler 11:40, 27 January 2008 (CST)