CZ:Proposals/New: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Should history articles be named with general terms first? == | == Should history articles be named with general terms first? == | ||
{{ | {{proposal | ||
|Proposal number = 0001 | |Proposal number = 0001 | ||
|Summary of proposal = Should general article names be written as [[France, history]] as preferred to [[History of France]] or [[French History]]? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g [[France, history]]) should be called [[History of France]] or even [[French history]]. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for [[France]] in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g: | |Summary of proposal = Should general article names be written as [[France, history]] as preferred to [[History of France]] or [[French History]]? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g [[France, history]]) should be called [[History of France]] or even [[French history]]. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for [[France]] in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g: | ||
*[[France]] | *[[France]] | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
*[[France, literature]] | *[[France, literature]] | ||
etc. | etc. | ||
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST) | |Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST) | ||
|Username of driver = | |Username of driver = | ||
|Next step = | |Next step = | ||
|Target date for next step = | |Target date for next step = | ||
|Notes= This has been discussed before but deserves a fuller debate. I don't really have an opinion on the issue despite the history workgroup handily being my most active one.[[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST) | |Notes= This has been discussed before but deserves a fuller debate. I don't really have an opinion on the issue despite the history workgroup handily being my most active one.[[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 17: | ||
==Enable external feedback== | ==Enable external feedback== | ||
{{ | {{proposal | ||
|Proposal number = 0002 | |Proposal number = 0002 | ||
|Brief descriptive title = Should history articles be named with general terms first? | |Brief descriptive title = Should history articles be named with general terms first? | ||
|Summary of proposal = Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit. | |Summary of proposal = Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit. | ||
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST) | |Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST) | ||
|Username of driver = | |Username of driver = | ||
|Next step = | |Next step = | ||
|Target date for next step = | |Target date for next step = | ||
|Notes = | |||
|Notes= | |||
}} | }} | ||
==Article Content Request help== | ==Article Content Request help== | ||
{{ | {{proposal | ||
|Proposal number = 0003 | |Proposal number = 0003 | ||
|Summary of proposal= [[CZ:ACR|Article Content Request]] should exist in order for authors to request article assistance on particular topics within a subject. This is '''not''' intended to be a request for editorial review, rather, it is a system devised to empower citizens to help out on subjects that they might know about. It is meant to spur activity and input from those who might have knowledge in a discipline. | |Summary of proposal= [[CZ:ACR|Article Content Request]] should exist in order for authors to request article assistance on particular topics within a subject. This is '''not''' intended to be a request for editorial review, rather, it is a system devised to empower citizens to help out on subjects that they might know about. It is meant to spur activity and input from those who might have knowledge in a discipline. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 39: | ||
|Notes = Theoretical page located at [[CZ:ACR]] using [[template:request]]. | |Notes = Theoretical page located at [[CZ:ACR]] using [[template:request]]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- TEMPLATE -- TEMPLATE -- TEMPLATE -- | |||
TO START A NEW PROPOSAL, COPY THE FOLLOWING UP TO "END COPY" | |||
AND PASTE JUST ABOVE THIS TEMPLATE. | |||
== Brief descriptive title == | |||
{{proposal | |||
|Proposal number = NNNN | |||
|Summary of proposal = | |||
|Name and date of original proposer = | |||
|Username of driver = | |||
|Next step = | |||
|Target date for next step = | |||
|Notes = | |||
}} | |||
END COPY -- DO NOT COPY THIS LINE --> | |||
Revision as of 14:58, 11 February 2008
Should history articles be named with general terms first?
| Summary: Should general article names be written as France, history as preferred to History of France or French History? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g France, history) should be called History of France or even French history. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for France in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g:
etc.
| ||||||
| To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal | ||||||
Enable external feedback
Summary: Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit.
| ||||
| Complete proposal | ||||
Article Content Request help
Summary: Article Content Request should exist in order for authors to request article assistance on particular topics within a subject. This is not intended to be a request for editorial review, rather, it is a system devised to empower citizens to help out on subjects that they might know about. It is meant to spur activity and input from those who might have knowledge in a discipline.
| ||||||
| To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal | ||||||