CZ:Proposals/New: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Christian Liem |
imported>Robert W King |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Improve general heading== | ==Improve general heading== | ||
The heading "Join! Help us create the world's most trusted encyclopedia and knowledge base. | {{reformatproposal | ||
|reason= Please use the proposal template. Remove the HTML comment code once this has been completed. | |||
|sign= --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 08:35, 10 February 2008 (CST) | |||
}} | |||
<!-- The heading "Join! Help us create the world's most trusted encyclopedia and knowledge base. | |||
The general public and experts collaborate, using their real names. A new knowledge society." | The general public and experts collaborate, using their real names. A new knowledge society." | ||
does not seem to be a good example of the kind of writing to be expected here. Is the last sentence a sentence? I propose, but do not know how to accomplish, the head be changed to something like: | does not seem to be a good example of the kind of writing to be expected here. Is the last sentence a sentence? I propose, but do not know how to accomplish, the head be changed to something like: | ||
| Line 43: | Line 48: | ||
# Eliminate "that if [sic] free to world" from one of David's proposals: "Join our new society of knowledge, consisting of experts and the general public, using our real names, and help create the world's most trusted encyclopedia and knowledge base." | # Eliminate "that if [sic] free to world" from one of David's proposals: "Join our new society of knowledge, consisting of experts and the general public, using our real names, and help create the world's most trusted encyclopedia and knowledge base." | ||
[[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 13:58, 9 February 2008 (CST) | [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 13:58, 9 February 2008 (CST) | ||
--> | |||
==Make "beta" tag a real tag== | ==Make "beta" tag a real tag== | ||
Revision as of 08:35, 10 February 2008
History Naming conventions
Summary: Please edit your proposal record and provide a summary.
| ||||
| To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal | ||||
- I think most people would type in History of France, so that should be the style. Of course they could also go to France first, and there would be the required link. Ro Thorpe 14:24, 9 February 2008 (CST) - And so it is. As for 'French history', I think most people would not choose it, a bit informal. Ro Thorpe 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- Questions: are we limiting this discussion to places, like History of France, or does it also extend to things, like History of the kilt? If yes, why? Why should we limit this to the history workgroup? Why not make one rule for the whole of Citizendium? Would people actually search for Kilt, history or History of the kilt? And why should we limit ourselves to the old-fashioned way of keeping tab of books in a library, where people search for books in little drawers of cards by the first word according to the Dewey Decimal system? Isn't this an internet site? Don't we have redirects? --Christian Liem 20:42, 9 February 2008 (CST)
Improve general heading
| Reason: Please use the proposal template. Remove the HTML comment code once this has been completed. |
Please reformat the proposal clearly, briefly, and using the {{Proposal}} template.
|
| Proposal editor: {{{editor}}} |
Make "beta" tag a real tag
THe "beta" tag seems to be lost. By simply adding a chain linking the tag to the what looks like a key, can find it a home.
Thomas Mandel 02:03, 9 February 2008 (CST)
Uh, what's a "tag"? Is it a synonym for "category"? I don't understand your proposal. Warren Schudy 13:45, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- He's talking about a prior graphic that was used for the logo. --Robert W King 13:50, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- It's this
is what he's talking about, versus the logo that's in the upper left. --Robert W King 14:02, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- It's this
User feedback
Summary: Please edit your proposal record and provide a summary.
| ||||
| To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal | ||||
Warren Schudy 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST)
| Response |
| By: --Denis Cavanagh 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST) |
| I think its a good idea as long as its technically feasible. |
We shouldn't have responses to proposals in the queue...it'll just get too messy. We need to discuss some basic questions about how this system should work before we start designing willy-nilly. Though the general outlines are looking quite good! --Larry Sanger 14:33, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- Maybe the responses should go in their own subdirectory and each proposal should have a number. Like, proposal #0001, and the discussion should go in CZ:Proposals/0001 --Robert W King 14:36, 9 February 2008 (CST)
Maybe, maybe not. This might imply that the proposals are decided here in the proposals system. They won't be, not entirely; they're decided finally elsewhere. No proposal will receive a final decision via discussion that happens on these proposals pages. This is just a central project management page. The proposal might be decided by the Editorial Council, for example. --Larry Sanger 14:46, 9 February 2008 (CST)