CZ:Proposals/New: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Robert W King |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
{{proposal | {{proposal | ||
|statement=Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit. | |statement=Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit. | ||
| | |reasoning= | ||
# Allow casual good Samaritans to help us improve. | # Allow casual good Samaritans to help us improve. | ||
# Submitting feedback is a low-commitment way for potential Citizens to get their feet wet. If we act on feedback, we can send the submitter an email thanking them for the feedback and encouraging them to sign up as a Citizen. | # Submitting feedback is a low-commitment way for potential Citizens to get their feet wet. If we act on feedback, we can send the submitter an email thanking them for the feedback and encouraging them to sign up as a Citizen. |
Revision as of 09:28, 10 February 2008
History Naming conventions
Summary: Please edit your proposal record and provide a summary.
| ||||
To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal |
- I think most people would type in History of France, so that should be the style. Of course they could also go to France first, and there would be the required link. Ro Thorpe 14:24, 9 February 2008 (CST) - And so it is. As for 'French history', I think most people would not choose it, a bit informal. Ro Thorpe 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- Questions: are we limiting this discussion to places, like History of France, or does it also extend to things, like History of the kilt? If yes, why? Why should we limit this to the history workgroup? Why not make one rule for the whole of Citizendium? Would people actually search for Kilt, history or History of the kilt? And why should we limit ourselves to the old-fashioned way of keeping tab of books in a library, where people search for books in little drawers of cards by the first word according to the Dewey Decimal system? Isn't this an internet site? Don't we have redirects? --Christian Liem 20:42, 9 February 2008 (CST)
Improve general heading
Reason: Please use the proposal template. Remove the HTML comment code once this has been completed. |
Please reformat the proposal clearly, briefly, and using the {{Proposal}} template.
|
Proposal editor: {{{editor}}} |
Make "beta" tag a real tag
Reason: Please use the proposal template. Remove the HTML comment code when this has been done. |
Please reformat the proposal clearly, briefly, and using the {{Proposal}} template.
|
Proposal editor: {{{editor}}} |
User feedback
Summary: Please edit your proposal record and provide a summary.
| ||||
To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal! Start complete proposal |
Warren Schudy 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST)
Response |
By: --Denis Cavanagh 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST) |
I think its a good idea as long as its technically feasible. |