CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0011: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


== Vote ==
== Vote ==
* [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Editorial_Council_Resolution_0011/Vote  Voting has ended]


== Current status ==
== Current status ==
*[http://mail.citizendium.org/pipermail/cz-editcouncil/2008-June/000467.html Initial (private) comments]
*Passed


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
Line 42: Line 43:
*Entered discussion of Amendment 1:  
*Entered discussion of Amendment 1:  
*Scheduled close of discussion of Amendment 1:  
*Scheduled close of discussion of Amendment 1:  
*Entered voting on motion to amend  
*Entered voting on motion to amend :
* Close of voting motion to amend  
* Close of voting motion to amend  
* Entered voting on resolution:
* Entered voting on resolution:24 July, for 10 days
* Close of voting on resolution:  
* Close of voting on resolution: 4 July, 2008




{{Editorial Council}}
{{Editorial Council}}

Latest revision as of 10:46, 4 July 2008

The resolution

Whereas, CZ wishes to promote a professional image, which requires some consistency of style and format of articles;

Whereas, different disciplines may require different approaches, thus ruling out a common standard for all articles, even within the same workgroup;

Whereas, general guidance for authors remains limited, and is easier to develop within workgroups;

Resolved, That Citizendium will develop a range of workgroup stylesheets for the guidance of authors and editors

Method of execution

The Council will call for a lead editor in each workgroup, to oversee and develop the stylesheet or stylesheets for that workgroup

Amendments

Vote

Current status

  • Passed

Discussion


Sponsors

Before it is added to the Agenda, these sponsors, but only these sponsors, may edit the text of the resolution. After it is added to the Agenda, it cannot be edited by anyone except via the amendment process.

Resolution history

  • Proposed: 09 June, 2008
  • Entered queue: (bypassed queue)
  • Entered initial discussion: 10 June, 2008 for 6 days
  • Entered public discussion: 17 June, 2008 for 7 days
  • Entered discussion of Amendment 1:
  • Scheduled close of discussion of Amendment 1:
  • Entered voting on motion to amend :
  • Close of voting motion to amend
  • Entered voting on resolution:24 July, for 10 days
  • Close of voting on resolution: 4 July, 2008


The Editorial Council was merged with the Management Council into a single governing body in 2013. All EC rules and decisions were upheld
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List ArchivesResolutionsLogEssential PolicyRules of ProcedureHow to Make a Resolution