Homeopathy/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
imported>Gareth Leng
(bias, not publication bias - that is a technical term with a different meaning)
Line 32: Line 32:
'''Publication bias against homeopathy'''
'''Publication bias against homeopathy'''


* Caulfield T, DeBow S (2005) [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/5/12 A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals.] ''BMC Complement Altern Med.'' 5:12. Review.
* Caulfield T, DeBow S (2005) [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/5/12 A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals.] ''BMC Complement Altern Med'' 5:12. Review.
   
   
: also see related articles in pubmed [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&Cmd=Link&LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles&IdsFromResult=15955254&ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed here].
: also see related articles in pubmed [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&Cmd=Link&LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles&IdsFromResult=15955254&ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed here].
Line 38: Line 38:
'''The Benveniste-Davenas affair (''Memory of water'' paper in ''Nature'', 1988)'''
'''The Benveniste-Davenas affair (''Memory of water'' paper in ''Nature'', 1988)'''


* See  Khuda-Bukhsh AR(2006) (cited above), p. 326. In response to a critique, Khuda-Bukhsh replies that, contrary to common belief, the results by Davenas & al. were replicated in several centers. This is one of the most serious accusations of publication bias formulated against mainstream journals concerning homeopathy.
* See  Khuda-Bukhsh AR(2006) (cited above), p. 326. In response to a critique, Khuda-Bukhsh replies that, contrary to common belief, the results by Davenas & al. were replicated in several centers. This is one of the most serious accusations of bias formulated against mainstream journals concerning homeopathy.


'''Concerning the Lancet 2005 study calling for the end homeopathy trials'''
'''Concerning the Lancet 2005 study calling for the end homeopathy trials'''


* {{cite journal |author=Fisher P |title=Homeopathy and ''The Lancet'' |journal=''Evid Based Complement Alternat Med'' |volume=3 |pages=145–7 |year=2006 |month=March |pmid=16550237 |pmc=1375230 |doi=10.1093/ecam/nek007 |url=}}
* {{cite journal |author=Fisher P |title=Homeopathy and ''The Lancet'' |journal=Evid Based Complement Alternat Med|volume=3 |pages=145–7 |year=2006 |month=March |pmid=16550237 |pmc=1375230 |doi=10.1093/ecam/nek007 |url=}}


* Bell IR (2005) [http://www.homeopathy.org/research/editorials/Bell.pdf All Evidence Is Equal, but Some Evidence Is More Equal than Others: Can Logic Prevail over Emotion in the Homeopathy Debate?] ''The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine''11:763-9. doi:10.1089/acm.2005.11.763.
* Bell IR (2005) [http://www.homeopathy.org/research/editorials/Bell.pdf All Evidence Is Equal, but Some Evidence Is More Equal than Others: Can Logic Prevail over Emotion in the Homeopathy Debate?] ''J Alt Comp Med'' 11:763-9. doi:10.1089/acm.2005.11.763.


'''Those who use homeopathy'''
'''Those who use homeopathy'''

Revision as of 06:00, 4 January 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Video [?]
Signed Articles [?]
 
A list of key readings about Homeopathy.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.

Hahnemann's writings

On the vital force; § 12, Sixth Edition

"It is the morbidly affected vital energy alone that produces disease, so that the morbid phenomena perceptible to our senses express at the same time all the internal change, that is to say, the whole morbid derangement of the internal dynamis; in a word, they reveal the whole disease; consequently, also, the disappearance under treatment of all the morbid phenomena and of all the morbid alterations that differ from the healthy vital operations, certainly affects and necessarily implies the restoration of the integrity of the vital force and, therefore, the recovered health of the whole organism."
(Footnote: "How the vital force causes the organism to display morbid phenomena, that is, how it produces disease, it would be of no practical utility to the physician to know, and will forever remain concealed from him; only what it is necessary for him to know of the disease and what is fully sufficient for enabling him to cure it, has the Lord of life revealed to his senses."


  • The Organon of the Healing Art (1810), a delineation of what he saw as the rationale for homeopathic medicine, and guidelines for practice. Hahnemann published the 5th edition in 1833; a revised draft was discovered after Hahnemann's death and published as the 6th edition in 1921.English translation

"The partisans of the old school of medicine flattered themselves that they could justly claim for it alone the title of ’rational medicine’, because they alone sought for and strove to remove the cause of disease ... [but] the greatest number of diseases are of dynamic (spiritual) origin and dynamic (spiritual) nature, their cause is therefore not perceptible to the senses. "



On the structure of water

  • Martin Chaplin, professor of applied sciences at London South Bank University, provides a comprehensive review of research about water structure:Water Structure and Science; Martin Chaplin's website. The July 2007 issue of the journal, Homeopathy, was edited by Chaplin and is devoted to the "memory of water." Copies of the articles in this special issue are freely available at a skeptic's website along with discussion (primarily from skeptics).(Homeopathy Journal Club Bad Science, a blog by Ben Goldacre)
An article from materials science (32 pages) in a journal that "is especially suited for the publication of results which are so new, so unexpected, that they are likely to be rejected by tradition-bound journals" [1]. Introduces many notions that are generally not well known by biologists and chemists, such as the implantation of qi into water by Qigong grandmasters. Presents the notion of epitaxy, a well known phenomenon in the industry. Roy also covers the 6 anomalies of water in light of the fact that water is not a random arrangement of single H2O molecules, but a combination of different phases (or 3D arrangements) of water molecules clusters. Disputes the current view of the majority of spectroscopists and theorists that the molecule in the liquid is surrounded tetrahedrally by 4 other water molecules. States that there is terminological confusion between structure in biochemistry and structure in materials science. See the rendition of a typical water structure (p 29). Roy adddresses the objection that such H2O arrangements are short lived, but does not discuss recent femtosecond (femto = 10−15) laser spectroscopy experiments, where it is found that hydrogen bonds are broken and reformed on a time scale of pico (pico = 10−12) seconds. Notes on the role of Van der Waals bonds in determining the properties of materials. The authors provide the tools to analyze homeopathic preparations, explaining why some techniques (including Raman) are adequate, while other are not, to characterize the structure of water. Presents in Fig. 17 some illegible Raman data on tap water, allegedly proving that the intramolecular vibrations (vibrations within the molecule, known to be relatively insensitive to the environment of the molecule) are changed by the emission of qi. Does not give the composition of the tap water. Raman data pertaining to intermolecular vibrations, which are very sensitive to the structure of water, are not given.

On the effect of dilutions on the properties of water

  • V. Eliaa et al. (2007) Conductometric studies of the serially diluted and agitated solutions on an anomalous effect that depends on the dilution process, Journal of Molecular Liquids, Volume 135, Issues 1-3, 31:158-165

Publication bias against homeopathy

also see related articles in pubmed here.

The Benveniste-Davenas affair (Memory of water paper in Nature, 1988)

  • See Khuda-Bukhsh AR(2006) (cited above), p. 326. In response to a critique, Khuda-Bukhsh replies that, contrary to common belief, the results by Davenas & al. were replicated in several centers. This is one of the most serious accusations of bias formulated against mainstream journals concerning homeopathy.

Concerning the Lancet 2005 study calling for the end homeopathy trials


Those who use homeopathy

  • Dana Ullman (2008) The Homeopathic Revolution: Famous People and Cultural Heroes Who Chose Homeopathy North Atlantic Books,U.S. ISBN 1556436718 Contains personal stories and quotes from Mark Twain, Charles Darwin, Martina Navratilova, David Beckham, Marlene Dietrich, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Orlando Bloom, Paul McCartney, Annie Lennox, Frederic Chopin, Vincent Van Gogh, Cindy Crawford, Bill Clinton, Florence Nightingale, Mother Teresa and others

Skeptics

  • Homeopathy and Its Kindred Delusions By Dr Oliver Wendell Holmes, physician, poet, and humorist. This essay was presented as two lectures to the Boston Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge in 1842.

"Suppose, then, a physician who has a hundred patients prescribes to each of them pills made of some entirely inert substance, as starch, for instance. Ninety of them get well, or if he chooses to use such language, he cures ninety of them. It is evident, according to the doctrine of chances, that there must be a considerable number of coincidences between the relief of the patient and the administration of the remedy. It is altogether probable that there will happen two or three very striking coincidences out of the whole ninety cases, in which it would seem evident that the medicine produced the relief, though it had, as we assumed, nothing to do with it. Now. suppose that the physician publishes these cases, will they not have a plausible appearance of proving that which, as we granted at the outset, was entirely false? ... How long will it take mankind to learn that while they listen to "the speaking hundreds and units, who make the world ring" with the pretended triumphs they have witnessed, the "dumb millions" of deluded and injured victims are paying the daily forfeit of their misplaced confidence!"



On UK Universities awarding degrees in homeopathy