Talk:Idempotence: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch (The case for separate articles depends on whether the meanings in the two arenas are actually incompatible or inconsistent) |
imported>Richard Pinch m (subpages) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
== Computer science == | == Computer science == | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 23 December 2008
Computer science
Idempotence is an extremely important computer science technique, in the design of transaction processing and database integrity. A number of the mathematical topics, created do have computer science, and since the concept is often taught in the "discrete mathematics" course delivered by computer science departments, I'd hate to do an artificial separation by disambiguation pages about different applications of the same concept. How do you think we should handle such topics? Howard C. Berkowitz 18:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I feel inlined to say "Just do it". Start off with sections "Idempotence in Mathematics" and "Idempotence in Computer Science", write what you want to write, add a sentence to the introduction and then take it from there. Let's see what happens? Richard Pinch 19:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, I feel that the case for separate articles depends on whether the meanings in the two arenas are actually incompatible or inconsistent. In this a reference here suggests that the two meanings are actually consistent. But then to me vi is a database query engine. Richard Pinch 19:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Mathematics Category Check
- Computers Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles