Talk:Cleveland, England: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Alexander J Bateman No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I just followed the Link from the Page on [[Yorkshire]], I agree that it seems an odd choice for the dominant article and as it is not crrently part of Yorkshire, [[Cleveland, England]] would seem to make the most sense?. --[[User:Alexander J Bateman|Alexander J Bateman]] 15:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | :I just followed the Link from the Page on [[Yorkshire]], I agree that it seems an odd choice for the dominant article and as it is not crrently part of Yorkshire, [[Cleveland, England]] would seem to make the most sense?. --[[User:Alexander J Bateman|Alexander J Bateman]] 15:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, I agree. Well, just use the "Move" button then. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:24, 31 December 2008
Hi Alexander! Welcome to Citizendium!
As you surely know, there is a perhaps better-known (and much more populous) Cleveland, namely Cleveland, Ohio. No offense, but I think even President Grover Cleveland is better-known than County Cleveland.
How about we create a disambiguation page on Cleveland and move the present Cleveland article to Cleveland, England or Cleveland, Yorkshire or whatever you think appropriate? --Larry Sanger 15:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I just followed the Link from the Page on Yorkshire, I agree that it seems an odd choice for the dominant article and as it is not crrently part of Yorkshire, Cleveland, England would seem to make the most sense?. --Alexander J Bateman 15:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. Well, just use the "Move" button then. --Larry Sanger 18:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)