User:Boris Tsirelson/Sandbox1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson
No edit summary
imported>Boris Tsirelson
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
angle is not defined in such spaces.
angle is not defined in such spaces.


The classical Euclidean space is of course three-dimensional. However, the modern theory defines an <math>n</math>–dimensional Euclidean space as an affine space over an math>n</math>–dimensional inner product space (over <math>\mathbb R<\math>); for <math>n=3</math> it is equivalent to the classical theory.
The classical Euclidean space is of course three-dimensional. However, the modern theory defines an <math>n</math>–dimensional Euclidean space as an affine space over an <math>n<\math>–dimensional inner product space (over <math>\mathbb R<\math>); for <math>n=3</math> it is equivalent to the classical theory.


Euclidean axioms leave no freedom, they determine uniquely all
Euclidean axioms leave no freedom, they determine uniquely all

Revision as of 12:41, 7 July 2009

       Space (mathematics)

In the ancient mathematics, "space" was a geometric abstraction of the three-dimensional space observed in the everyday life. Axiomatization of this space, started by Euclid, was finished in the 19 century. Non-equivalent axiomatic systems appeared in the same 19 century: the hyperbolic geometry (Nikolai Lobachevskii, Janos Bolyai, Carl Gauss) and the elliptic geometry (Georg Riemann). Thus, different three-dimensional spaces appeared: Euclidean, hyperbolic and elliptic. These are symmetric spaces; a symmetric space looks the same around every point.

Much more general, not necessarily symmetric spaces were introduced in 1854 by Riemann, to be used by Albert Einstein in 1916 as a foundation of his general theory of relativity. An Einstein space looks differently around different points, because its geometry is influenced by matter.

In 1872 the Erlangen program by Felix Klein proclaimed various kinds of geometry corresponding to various transformation groups. Thus, new kinds of symmetric spaces appeared: metric, affine, projective (and some others).

The distinction between Euclidean, hyperbolic and elliptic spaces is not similar to the distinction between metric, affine and projective spaces. In the latter case one wonders, which questions apply, in the former --- which answers hold. For example, the question about the sum of the three angles of a triangle: is it equal to 180 degrees, or less, or more? In Euclidean space the answer is "equal", in hyperbolic space --- "less"; in elliptic space --- "more". However, this question does not apply to an affine or projective space, since the notion of angle is not defined in such spaces.

The classical Euclidean space is of course three-dimensional. However, the modern theory defines an –dimensional Euclidean space as an affine space over an Failed to parse (unknown function "\math"): {\displaystyle n<\math>–dimensional inner product space (over <math>\mathbb R<\math>); for <math>n=3} it is equivalent to the classical theory.

Euclidean axioms leave no freedom, they determine uniquely all geometric properties of the space. More exactly: all three-dimensional Euclidean spaces are mutually isomorphic. In this sense we have "the" three-dimensional Euclidean space. Three-dimensional symmetric hyperbolic (or elliptic) spaces differ by a single parameter, the curvature. The definition of a Riemann space leaves a huge freedom, more than a finite number of numeric parameters. On the other hand, all affine (or projective) spaces are mutually isomorphic, provided that they are three-dimensional (or n-dimensional for a given n) and over the reals (or another given field of scalars).

Nowadays mathematics uses a wide assortment of spaces. Many of them are quite far from the ancient geometry. Here is a rough and incomplete classification according to the applicable questions (rather than answers). First, some basic classes.

Space Stipulates
Projective Straight lines.
Topological Convergence, continuity. Open sets, closed sets.

Distances between points are defined in metric spaces. In addition, all questions applicable to topological spaces apply also to metric spaces, since each metric space "downgrades" to the corresponding topological space. Such relations between classes of spaces are shown below.

Space Is richer than Stipulates
Affine Projective Parallel lines
Linear Affine Origin. Vectors.
Linear topological Linear space. Topological space.
Metric Topological space. Distances.
Normed Linear topological space. Metric space.
Inner product Normed space. Angles.
Euclidean Affine. Metric. Angles.

A finer classification uses answers to some (applicable) questions.

Space Special cases Properties
Linear three-dimensional Basis of 3 vectors
finite-dimensional A finite basis
Metric complete All Cauchy sequences converge
Topological compact Every open covering has a finite subcovering
connected Only trivial open-and-closed sets
Normed Banach Complete
Inner product Hilbert Complete

Waiving distances and angles while retaining volumes (of geometric bodies) one moves toward measure theory and the corresponding spaces listed below. Besides the volume, a measure generalizes area, length, mass (or charge) distribution, and also probability distribution, according to Andrey Kolmogorov's approach to probability theory.

Space Stipulates
Measurable Measurable sets and functions.
Measure Measures and integrals.

Measure space is richer than measurable space. Also, Euclidean space is richer than measure space.

Space Special cases Properties
Measurable standard Isomorphic to a Polish space with the Borel σ-algebra.
Measure standard Isomorphic mod 0 to a Polish space with a finite Borel measure.
Probability The whole space is of measure 1.