Talk:Adams-Onís Treaty/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day |
imported>Roger A. Lohmann |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
This might help the reader to quickly find out about the main points. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 15:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | This might help the reader to quickly find out about the main points. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 15:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 04:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | :I agree. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 04:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Approval of Draft Revision?== | |||
The draft of this article has been substantially reorganized and it appears nearly ready for approval as a revision (I assume it will be 1.2 or is it 1.1?) I've made a few small additional edits, but nothing of a content nature, so I intend to recommend it. First, however, the two footnotes need to be fleshed out more fully. The entry by Weeks on the Bibliography page is for a different work/edition. Cash, 1998 appears to be the one listed in the biblio. Can anyone confirm that? The Parent Topics on the related pages seem awfully general. Isn't there a logical topic on Diplomacy or Treaties or something along those lines that could be included there? Why are West Florida and East Florida included as Related Topics, and not Alabama, Arkansas, which are both explicitly mentioned in article or book titles? I don't get the connection to the Oregon Territory at all. If we can get these few things squared away (either eliminated or clarified), I will be ready to recommend the approval of this revision. | |||
[[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] 01:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:12, 5 August 2009
updated definition
Approval
Did this one slip through the net?
- Never mind I just noticed the date is today. Chris Day 08:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Approved
Congratulations Richard and Russell for Approval of Version 1.0! D. Matt Innis 15:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
What about adding some sections to the text?
This might help the reader to quickly find out about the main points. --Daniel Mietchen 15:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Chris Day 04:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Approval of Draft Revision?
The draft of this article has been substantially reorganized and it appears nearly ready for approval as a revision (I assume it will be 1.2 or is it 1.1?) I've made a few small additional edits, but nothing of a content nature, so I intend to recommend it. First, however, the two footnotes need to be fleshed out more fully. The entry by Weeks on the Bibliography page is for a different work/edition. Cash, 1998 appears to be the one listed in the biblio. Can anyone confirm that? The Parent Topics on the related pages seem awfully general. Isn't there a logical topic on Diplomacy or Treaties or something along those lines that could be included there? Why are West Florida and East Florida included as Related Topics, and not Alabama, Arkansas, which are both explicitly mentioned in article or book titles? I don't get the connection to the Oregon Territory at all. If we can get these few things squared away (either eliminated or clarified), I will be ready to recommend the approval of this revision. Roger Lohmann 01:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)