Talk:Internet: Difference between revisions
imported>Dan Nessett |
imported>Dan Nessett (→Need to expand section on history of the Internet: new section) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Done. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 03:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | :Done. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 03:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Need to expand section on history of the Internet == | |||
In some side conversations, it is noted that an article on the Internet would benefit from a discussion of its history. This would include a discussion of the technologies that led up to the internet as well as a discussion of the technologies used currently. This is a reasonable point and deserves discussion. So, let me open the discussion in this section. Those who have an opinion on this issue are hereby invited to provide it here. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 04:31, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:31, 19 September 2009
Why did you delete most of the text in the Internet architecture section?
Howard,
Most of the material in the Internet architecture section is deleted. Why did you do that? Dan Nessett 17:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm. This is a mystery. I just looked at the history of the article and it doesn't look like Howard deleted anything. And yet, the text is now missing. I will contact CZ admins for some help with this. Dan Nessett 17:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- See my note on Matt's talk page. Hayford Peirce 18:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Newsgroups
In the first paragraph, newsgroups/usenet should be mentioned along with email and ftp. (I don't add it myself, so that noone can claim I added content in case of an approval.) Peter Schmitt 01:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Dan Nessett 03:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Need to expand section on history of the Internet
In some side conversations, it is noted that an article on the Internet would benefit from a discussion of its history. This would include a discussion of the technologies that led up to the internet as well as a discussion of the technologies used currently. This is a reasonable point and deserves discussion. So, let me open the discussion in this section. Those who have an opinion on this issue are hereby invited to provide it here. Dan Nessett 04:31, 20 September 2009 (UTC)