Talk:Lewis Carroll: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ed Poor
(wondering about source and credit for lengthy passage)
imported>Peter Schmitt
(unfortunately, I have to agree)
Line 7: Line 7:


Not sure how much we can quote as "fair use". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Not sure how much we can quote as "fair use". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
: Unfortunately I have to agree. Were it a WP import it would not be even near to being live. Since I firmly believe that CZ content should not be copied -- even if this import is allowed by copyright -- it should not be left as it is. If copyright is no issue, it could get status 4 (without WP credit, of course), if there are doubts then blanking and adding a stub should be done. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 14:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:58, 27 April 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The pen-name of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (1832-1898), British mathematician and author of children's books (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Through the Looking Glass, The Hunting of the Snark). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Literature, Mathematics and Visual Arts [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive 1  English language variant British English

How much of the "slender and handsome in a soft-focused dreamy sort of way" text is copied from Karoline Leach? And can we get her to contribute her text to us under GPL? [1] --Ed Poor 13:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Biography compiled by the webmaster © carrollmyth.com/lewiscarroll.cc

NB:You are welcome to use this material under the stipulations of 'FAIR USE', but please cite the source. [2]

Not sure how much we can quote as "fair use". --Ed Poor 13:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have to agree. Were it a WP import it would not be even near to being live. Since I firmly believe that CZ content should not be copied -- even if this import is allowed by copyright -- it should not be left as it is. If copyright is no issue, it could get status 4 (without WP credit, of course), if there are doubts then blanking and adding a stub should be done. --Peter Schmitt 14:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)