Talk:Lewis Carroll: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
imported>Hayford Peirce
Line 15: Line 15:


:Good catch Ed.  Go ahead and delete it Hayford. Leave the talk page, though. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 01:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
:Good catch Ed.  Go ahead and delete it Hayford. Leave the talk page, though. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 01:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks, Matt.  That's enough for me.  I'll leave this talk page, however. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 01:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:50, 27 April 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The pen-name of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (1832-1898), British mathematician and author of children's books (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Through the Looking Glass, The Hunting of the Snark). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Literature, Mathematics and Visual Arts [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive 1  English language variant British English

How much of the "slender and handsome in a soft-focused dreamy sort of way" text is copied from Karoline Leach? And can we get her to contribute her text to us under GPL? [1] --Ed Poor 13:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Biography compiled by the webmaster © carrollmyth.com/lewiscarroll.cc

NB:You are welcome to use this material under the stipulations of 'FAIR USE', but please cite the source. [2]

Not sure how much we can quote as "fair use". --Ed Poor 13:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have to agree. Were it a WP import it would not be even near to being live. Since I firmly believe that CZ content should not be copied -- even if this import is allowed by copyright -- it should not be left as it is. If copyright is no issue, it could get status 4 (without WP credit, of course), if there are doubts then blanking and adding a stub should be done. --Peter Schmitt 14:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Far, far beyond Fair Use

I am appalled by this article. Evidently Meg Ireland brought it in 100% with no attempt to give it attribution or even make a *pass* at calling it "Fair Use". There is no indication anywhere in the article or on the Talk page that she herself did not write it in its entirety. As far as I'm concerned it's out and out plagiarism. Unless someone gives me *very* strong counterarguments, I will be deleting it entirely. Hayford Peirce 00:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Good catch Ed. Go ahead and delete it Hayford. Leave the talk page, though. D. Matt Innis 01:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Matt. That's enough for me. I'll leave this talk page, however. Hayford Peirce 01:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)