Talk:Entropy (thermodynamics): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Paul Wormer (→Length of inset: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Length of inset == | |||
On the page [[User talk:Daniel_Mietchen]] there was the following short discussion initiated by a request of [[User: Paul Wormer]] to Daniel to check the translation given in the inset. | |||
I put my version directly on the [[:Image:Text_entropy.png|image page]] but think the article may merit a shorter version. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 18:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Yes I had some doubts myself about the length of the inset. On the other hand, I have seen so many mistakes in the quotation and also because Clausius thought of the name ''Verwandlungsinhalt'', that I thought it would be interesting to have it. Maybe just the translation is sufficient and a good compromise?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
::That would be a possibility but I am generally in favour of showing excerpts from original sources, and ''Verwandlungsinhalt'' is certainly instructive. So I pasted the whole translation in for the time being. Let's take another look at this after a while, or ask others, and decide then. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 08:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Question to other citizens: anybody has an opinion about the inset and its length? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:16, 9 November 2009
Length of inset
On the page User talk:Daniel_Mietchen there was the following short discussion initiated by a request of User: Paul Wormer to Daniel to check the translation given in the inset.
I put my version directly on the image page but think the article may merit a shorter version. --Daniel Mietchen 18:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I had some doubts myself about the length of the inset. On the other hand, I have seen so many mistakes in the quotation and also because Clausius thought of the name Verwandlungsinhalt, that I thought it would be interesting to have it. Maybe just the translation is sufficient and a good compromise?--Paul Wormer 07:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- That would be a possibility but I am generally in favour of showing excerpts from original sources, and Verwandlungsinhalt is certainly instructive. So I pasted the whole translation in for the time being. Let's take another look at this after a while, or ask others, and decide then. --Daniel Mietchen 08:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Question to other citizens: anybody has an opinion about the inset and its length? --Paul Wormer 10:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Chemistry Developing Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles