Talk:Led Zeppelin/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Meg Taylor (comment) |
imported>Tom Morris No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This article and the whole cluster is really amazing! Well done, Meg! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:49, 7 March 2008 (CST) | This article and the whole cluster is really amazing! Well done, Meg! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:49, 7 March 2008 (CST) | ||
:Thanks, Larry. I really appreciate the kudos. [[User:Meg Ireland|Meg Ireland]] 17:28, 9 March 2008 (CDT) | :Thanks, Larry. I really appreciate the kudos. [[User:Meg Ireland|Meg Ireland]] 17:28, 9 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
Great work! The only thing I'm seeing which is slightly jarring is the [[Led Zeppelin/Related Articles|Related Articles]] subpage. The list of bootlegs needs to be on the Discography subpage, and the Related Articles page ought to follow the hierarchical form used on other RA subpages - see [[Biology/Related Articles]] for a standard example. The point of the RA subpages is that people can use them to navigate to higher level categories (in this case: popular music, rock music), to subtopics (which would, in this case, be albums, musicians, tours and songs that have their own article cluster), and related articles (for musical subjects, that would be similar bands and peformers, related genres and bands that members of this band have been in before or after this band - in this case, [[The Yardbirds]], XYZ etc.). Currently, the Related Articles page doesn't actually link to any other related articles. The list of all the people who have been in the band should probably be in Catalogs. Congratulations and thank you for all the hard work you've obviously put in on these pages! –[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 14:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:10, 25 April 2009
This article and the whole cluster is really amazing! Well done, Meg! --Larry Sanger 08:49, 7 March 2008 (CST)
- Thanks, Larry. I really appreciate the kudos. Meg Ireland 17:28, 9 March 2008 (CDT)
Great work! The only thing I'm seeing which is slightly jarring is the Related Articles subpage. The list of bootlegs needs to be on the Discography subpage, and the Related Articles page ought to follow the hierarchical form used on other RA subpages - see Biology/Related Articles for a standard example. The point of the RA subpages is that people can use them to navigate to higher level categories (in this case: popular music, rock music), to subtopics (which would, in this case, be albums, musicians, tours and songs that have their own article cluster), and related articles (for musical subjects, that would be similar bands and peformers, related genres and bands that members of this band have been in before or after this band - in this case, The Yardbirds, XYZ etc.). Currently, the Related Articles page doesn't actually link to any other related articles. The list of all the people who have been in the band should probably be in Catalogs. Congratulations and thank you for all the hard work you've obviously put in on these pages! –Tom Morris 14:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)