Talk:Geometric sequence/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson (→More examples: new section) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→What about zero?: right) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:<math> 0, 0, 1</math> | :<math> 0, 0, 1</math> | ||
[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 10:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 10:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: Right. But what is meant by 0,0,1 ? --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 16:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
== What about q? == | == What about q? == |
Revision as of 10:52, 11 May 2010
Cannot resist
The term still reminds me of the order in which students entered the room for geometry class; I was generally last. --Howard C. Berkowitz 21:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
What about zero?
It is unclear for now, whether the following sequences are geometric or not:
Boris Tsirelson 10:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Right. But what is meant by 0,0,1 ? --Peter Schmitt 16:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
What about q?
"...is called geometric sequence if
for all indices i." — I'd add, "and some number q (not dependent on i)." Boris Tsirelson 10:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
More examples
An example of an infinite increasing sequence could be added. Also a constant sequence. Boris Tsirelson 10:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)