Talk:Yamato-class: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎hyphen not needed: please give me some examples)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(What is the point to this argument?)
Line 8: Line 8:


::Please show me three examples of "naval literature" using it and I will say no more.  Otherwise I will Move the article -- grammatically, it is not correct to have the hyphen. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 01:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
::Please show me three examples of "naval literature" using it and I will say no more.  Otherwise I will Move the article -- grammatically, it is not correct to have the hyphen. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 01:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
:::Since many of such things are books, I can't readily send them. Nevertheless, this has nothing to do with grammar, and, as a Military Editor, make an interim ruling that it is the style of the Military Workgroup for ship class names. Are you proposing to move every other class name?  [[Battle-class]], [[Burke-class]], [[County-class]], [[H-class]], [[Fletcher-class]], [[Iowa-class]], [[Kongo-class]], [[Ticonderoga-class]], [[Sovremenny-class]], [[Type 42-class]]...
:::I see no point to having this argument. Take it to the Editorial Council when it's ready; otherwise, you will be acting as a Citizen in violation of an Editor Ruling.  [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 02:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:33, 15 July 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Largest (71,000 ton) battleship class of the Imperial Japanese Navy, the largest but not necessarily most combat-effective ever built; all sunk in combat by U.S. forces (including IJN Shinano, a Yamato-class hull converted to an aircraft carrier) [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Military [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  Pacific War
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

hyphen not needed

We have the "Iowa class battleships" all over the Internet without the hyphen, plus, as far as I can see, "Yamato class battleships" also all over the Internet with no hyphen. Just a slip of your computer finger? Hayford Peirce 22:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

There's no standard. I see it with a hyphen more frequently than not, in naval literature. It's useful, I think, to help make it clear that one is talking about IJN Yamato versus Yamato-class. I really don't want to get into arguments about "all over the Internet". Howard C. Berkowitz 01:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Please show me three examples of "naval literature" using it and I will say no more. Otherwise I will Move the article -- grammatically, it is not correct to have the hyphen. Hayford Peirce 01:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Since many of such things are books, I can't readily send them. Nevertheless, this has nothing to do with grammar, and, as a Military Editor, make an interim ruling that it is the style of the Military Workgroup for ship class names. Are you proposing to move every other class name? Battle-class, Burke-class, County-class, H-class, Fletcher-class, Iowa-class, Kongo-class, Ticonderoga-class, Sovremenny-class, Type 42-class...
I see no point to having this argument. Take it to the Editorial Council when it's ready; otherwise, you will be acting as a Citizen in violation of an Editor Ruling. Howard C. Berkowitz 02:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)