Karma system: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: A '''Karma system''', also known as a '''web reputation system''' is, at its most general, an automated or semiautomated method of characterizing online user behavior in a way useful to th...)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
A '''Karma system''', also known as a '''web reputation system''' is, at its most general, an automated or semiautomated method of characterizing online user behavior in a way useful to the particular venue. The term "reputation system" is broader than [[World Wide Web]] context alone, and draws from the [[distributed trust]] model used by [[Pretty Good Privacy]] to assess the reliability of [[cryptographic key]]s, and, indirectly, the reputation of their user.
A '''Karma system''', also known as a '''web reputation system''' is, at its most general, an automated or semiautomated method of characterizing online user behavior in a way useful to the particular venue. The term "reputation system" is broader than [[World Wide Web]] context alone, and draws from the [[distributed trust]] model used by [[Pretty Good Privacy]] to assess the reliability of [[cryptographic key]]s, and, indirectly, the reputation of their user.



Revision as of 08:48, 29 July 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

A Karma system, also known as a web reputation system is, at its most general, an automated or semiautomated method of characterizing online user behavior in a way useful to the particular venue. The term "reputation system" is broader than World Wide Web context alone, and draws from the distributed trust model used by Pretty Good Privacy to assess the reliability of cryptographic keys, and, indirectly, the reputation of their user.

Farmer and Glass have described some general terms for characterizing karma systems. First, a system may be public, with its findings immediately available to all or most users, or private, available only to administrators who control others' access. In all cases, the karma score is context-specific and should not be generalized to things beyond its capability, within the site or to other venues. They mention, as one example of overuse of a reputation, the FICO score for creditworthiness widely used in the United States, which has been controversially applied to such things as risk in granting insurance. [1]

References

  1. Randy Farmer and Bryce Glass, On Karma: Top-line Lessons on User Reputation Design, Building Web Reputation Systems: The Blog