Generative linguistics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(Deleted a paragraph in which everything was untrue)
imported>John Stephenson
(some rewording)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{linguistics}}
{{linguistics}}
'''Generative linguistics''' is a school of thought within [[linguistics]] that makes use of the concept of a [[generative grammar]]. The term "generative grammar" is used in different ways by different people, and the term "generative linguistics" therefore has a range of different, though overlapping, meanings.
'''Generative linguistics''' is a school of thought within [[linguistics]] that makes use of the concept of a ''[[generative grammar]]''. The term 'generative grammar' is used in several different ways, and so 'generative linguistics' therefore has a range of different, though overlapping, meanings.


Formally, a generative grammar is defined as one that is fully explicit. It is a finite set of rules that can be applied to ''generate'' exactly those sentences (often, but not necessarily, infinite in number) that are grammatical in a given language (or, of course, particular [[dialect]] or otherwise [[sociolinguistics|sociolinguistically]] defined way of using a language), and no others. This is the definition that is offered by [[Noam Chomsky]], who popularised the term, and by most dictionaries of linguistics. It is important to note that ''generate'' is being used as a technical term with a slightly obscure sense. To say that a grammar generates a sentence means that the grammar "assigns a structural description" to the sentence.<ref>{{cite book|title=Aspects of the Theory of Syntax|author=Chomsky, Noam|year=1965|publisher=MIT Press}}</ref>
Formally, a generative grammar is defined as one that is fully ''explicit''. It is a finite set of rules that can be applied to ''generate'' exactly those sentences (often, but not necessarily, infinite in number) that are grammatical in a given language, and no others. This is the definition that is offered by [[Noam Chomsky]], who popularised the term, and by most dictionaries of linguistics. The term 'generate' is not used in the popular sense of 'create'; rather, it means that the grammar "assigns a structural description" to the sentence.<ref>{{cite book|title=Aspects of the Theory of Syntax|author=Chomsky, Noam|year=1965|publisher=MIT Press}}</ref>


More popularly, but somewhat to the apparent distaste of certain professional linguists including Chomsky, the term is used to define the approach to linguistics taken by Chomsky and his followers. Chomsky's approach is characterised by the use of [[transformational grammar]] - a theory that has changed greatly since it was first promulgated by Chomsky in his [[1957]] book ''[[Syntactic Structures]]'' - and by the assertion of a strong linguistic [[nativism]] (and therefore an assertion that some set of fundamental characteristics of all human languages must be the same). The term "generative linguistics" is often applied to the earliest version of Chomsky's transformational grammar, which was associated with a distinction between "[[Deep Structure]]" and "[[Surface Structure]]" of sentences.
More controversially, the term is used to define the approach to linguistics taken by Chomsky and his followers. Chomsky's approach is characterised by the use of [[transformational grammar]] - a theory that has changed greatly since it was first promulgated by Chomsky in his [[1957]] book ''[[Syntactic Structures]]'' - and by the assertion of a strong linguistic [[nativism]] (and therefore an assertion that some set of fundamental characteristics of all human languages must be the same). The term 'generative linguistics' is often applied to the earliest version of Chomsky's transformational grammar, which was associated with a distinction between the "[[Deep Structure]]" and "[[Surface Structure]]" of sentences.


[[Psycholinguistics]], which in the early [[1960s]] was developing rapidly as part of the general movement towards [[cognitive psychology]], found this anti-behaviorist emphasis congenial, and rapidly absorbed many Chomskian ideas including the notion of generative grammar.  However, as both cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics have matured, they have found less and less use for generative linguistics, not least because Chomsky has repeatedly emphasised that he never intended to specify the mental processes by which people actually generate sentences, or parse sentences that they hear or read.
[[Psycholinguistics]], which in the early [[1960s]] was developing rapidly as part of the general movement towards [[cognitive psychology]], found this anti-behaviorist emphasis congenial, and rapidly absorbed many Chomskian ideas including the notion of generative grammar.  However, as both cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics have matured, they have found less and less use for generative linguistics, not least because Chomsky has repeatedly emphasised that he never intended to specify the mental processes by which people actually generate sentences, or parse sentences that they hear or read.

Revision as of 02:39, 7 April 2007

Linguistics
Phonology
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Theoretical linguistics
Generative linguistics
Cognitive linguistics
Language acquisition
First language acquisition
Second language acquisition
Applied linguistics
Psycholinguistics
Phonetics
Sociolinguistics
Creolistics
Evolutionary linguistics
Linguistic variation
Linguistic typology
Anthropological linguistics
Computational linguistics
Descriptive linguistics
Historical linguistics
Comparative linguistics
History of linguistics
Languagenaturalconstructed
Grammar

Generative linguistics is a school of thought within linguistics that makes use of the concept of a generative grammar. The term 'generative grammar' is used in several different ways, and so 'generative linguistics' therefore has a range of different, though overlapping, meanings.

Formally, a generative grammar is defined as one that is fully explicit. It is a finite set of rules that can be applied to generate exactly those sentences (often, but not necessarily, infinite in number) that are grammatical in a given language, and no others. This is the definition that is offered by Noam Chomsky, who popularised the term, and by most dictionaries of linguistics. The term 'generate' is not used in the popular sense of 'create'; rather, it means that the grammar "assigns a structural description" to the sentence.[1]

More controversially, the term is used to define the approach to linguistics taken by Chomsky and his followers. Chomsky's approach is characterised by the use of transformational grammar - a theory that has changed greatly since it was first promulgated by Chomsky in his 1957 book Syntactic Structures - and by the assertion of a strong linguistic nativism (and therefore an assertion that some set of fundamental characteristics of all human languages must be the same). The term 'generative linguistics' is often applied to the earliest version of Chomsky's transformational grammar, which was associated with a distinction between the "Deep Structure" and "Surface Structure" of sentences.

Psycholinguistics, which in the early 1960s was developing rapidly as part of the general movement towards cognitive psychology, found this anti-behaviorist emphasis congenial, and rapidly absorbed many Chomskian ideas including the notion of generative grammar. However, as both cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics have matured, they have found less and less use for generative linguistics, not least because Chomsky has repeatedly emphasised that he never intended to specify the mental processes by which people actually generate sentences, or parse sentences that they hear or read.

Cognitive linguistics emerged in the latter years of the twentieth century as an alternative linguistic paradigm to generative linguistics. Cognitive linguistics seeks to unify the understanding of language with the understanding of how specific neural structures function biologically. This is more a difference in practical research strategy than in philosophy: in principle, neurological evidence has always been considered relevant by generative linguists, but in practice it has usually been regarded as too inconclusive and open to interpretation to be of much use. However, some researchers within generative linguistics (e.g. Alec Marantz) publish in neurolinguistics.

Reference

  1. Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.