Talk:Venn diagram: Difference between revisions
imported>John R. Brews (Reply to Hayford) |
imported>John R. Brews (→Maybe some explanation for the layman?: Addendum to Hayford) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Of course it would be useful to do that. It requires a discussion of how logical propositions can be mapped into Venn diagrams. That has not been done so far in this article. It is discussed in Venn's book ''Symbolic logic'' referred to in the article. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 03:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC) | :Of course it would be useful to do that. It requires a discussion of how logical propositions can be mapped into Venn diagrams. That has not been done so far in this article. It is discussed in Venn's book ''Symbolic logic'' referred to in the article. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 03:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I added some sentences to the introductory paragraph that I hope will alleviate this problem of orientation. A section on the application of Venn diagrams would be great, or maybe a new article on design of logic circuits using Venn diagrams. For me, I'll have to wait until the urge to write such items strikes. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 16:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:43, 13 July 2011
Maybe some explanation for the layman?
In today's New York Times there is a letter that begins:
Re “Who’s on the Family Tree? Now It’s Complicated” (front page, July 5):
Separating the trees into “genetic relatives” and “emotional relatives” might be more appropriate as a Venn diagram, since the two can overlap. A “roots and wings” tree, such as I have done, might make more sense. My children’s biological parents are their roots; as adoptive parents, my husband and I have given our children their wings to fly.
(At http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/opinion/l11family.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=venn%20diagram&st=cse)
Wouldn't it be useful for people like me, and other non-mathematic reader of the Times, to *explain* a little more in layman's language about what a Venn diagram does and why it is useful? Thanks! Hayford Peirce 03:21, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Of course it would be useful to do that. It requires a discussion of how logical propositions can be mapped into Venn diagrams. That has not been done so far in this article. It is discussed in Venn's book Symbolic logic referred to in the article. John R. Brews 03:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- I added some sentences to the introductory paragraph that I hope will alleviate this problem of orientation. A section on the application of Venn diagrams would be great, or maybe a new article on design of logic circuits using Venn diagrams. For me, I'll have to wait until the urge to write such items strikes. John R. Brews 16:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Mathematics Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Engineering Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Engineering Underlinked Articles