User talk:K kay shearin: Difference between revisions
imported>K kay shearin m (removing obsolete notice) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Law== | ==Law== | ||
I suspect it was forgotten, since if you look at the [[Citizendium_Pilot_talk:Discipline_Workgroups|workgroup talk page]] it is one of the original workgroups. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 10:38, 7 December 2006 (CST) | I suspect it was forgotten, since if you look at the [[Citizendium_Pilot_talk:Discipline_Workgroups|workgroup talk page]] it is one of the original workgroups. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 10:38, 7 December 2006 (CST) | ||
== Category re queen consorts == | |||
Hi Kay, far be it from me to discourage boldness, which I generally admire, I don't think we should use categories as a special kind of article, but your latest Category entry [[:Category:English queens consort]] would imply we're doing that. Actually, we are long overdue discussing the whole matter of categories and what to do with them. Frankly, I think we should probably delete them ''all'' and either start over, or do something entirely different. I hope I'll have time to elaborate more tomorrow. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:27, 31 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 22:27, 31 January 2007
Welcome, Kay! --Larry Sanger 02:19, 31 October 2006 (CST)
Law
I suspect it was forgotten, since if you look at the workgroup talk page it is one of the original workgroups. Chris Day (Talk) 10:38, 7 December 2006 (CST)
Category re queen consorts
Hi Kay, far be it from me to discourage boldness, which I generally admire, I don't think we should use categories as a special kind of article, but your latest Category entry Category:English queens consort would imply we're doing that. Actually, we are long overdue discussing the whole matter of categories and what to do with them. Frankly, I think we should probably delete them all and either start over, or do something entirely different. I hope I'll have time to elaborate more tomorrow. --Larry Sanger 22:27, 31 January 2007 (CST)