Talk:John Logie Baird/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Lamont No edit summary |
imported>Russell Potter (Thanks) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I've done a few adjustments on this article, but nothing substantial. My background is in broadcast engineering, so hopefully I can complement what you're doing. [[User:Richard Lamont|Richard Lamont]] 16:26, 9 January 2007 (CST) | :I've done a few adjustments on this article, but nothing substantial. My background is in broadcast engineering, so hopefully I can complement what you're doing. [[User:Richard Lamont|Richard Lamont]] 16:26, 9 January 2007 (CST) | ||
== Thanks == | |||
Richard, thanks for the note -- delighted to have someone with your expertise interested in this article! | |||
I agree with you about the WP Baird entry. I'd like to see more here -- depth, details, and some accounting of new understandings of Baird made possible by Donald McLean's restored recordings, as as his book and the recent biography by Baird's son Malcolm (written with Anthony Kamm). If done well, this could be a candidate for article approval at some point fairly early on in the project, which I think would be great! | |||
[[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 11:33, 11 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 11:33, 11 January 2007
The wikipedia's article on Baird has always struck me as very stubby. What little information it has is incomplete or misleading.
As with the article on Sir John Franklin, I'm leaving the WP version around as a scaffold, but as the new materials are added, I will be removing most of it.
My knowledge of Baird is from my viewpoint as a researcher on the history of mass media -- if there are any electrical engineers among the editors, I would welcome some attention to those more technical aspects of Baird's achievements.
Russell Potter 12:21, 31 October 2006 (CST)
- I've done a few adjustments on this article, but nothing substantial. My background is in broadcast engineering, so hopefully I can complement what you're doing. Richard Lamont 16:26, 9 January 2007 (CST)
Thanks
Richard, thanks for the note -- delighted to have someone with your expertise interested in this article!
I agree with you about the WP Baird entry. I'd like to see more here -- depth, details, and some accounting of new understandings of Baird made possible by Donald McLean's restored recordings, as as his book and the recent biography by Baird's son Malcolm (written with Anthony Kamm). If done well, this could be a candidate for article approval at some point fairly early on in the project, which I think would be great!
Russell Potter 11:33, 11 January 2007 (CST)