Talk:Geochronology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nereo Preto (Why is it so different?) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
As I post this article, I add also a clarification. The original article in WP was really about [[geochronometry]]. I know many Earth scientists do not like to distinguish between [[geochronology]] and [[geochronometry]] (and I am among them). But the latest edition of the International Stratigraphic guide has different definitions for these disciplines, thus, I decided to stick with the Guide. That's why this article is so different from its "parent". | As I post this article, I add also a clarification. The original article in WP was really about [[geochronometry]]. I know many Earth scientists do not like to distinguish between [[geochronology]] and [[geochronometry]] (and I am among them). But the latest edition of the International Stratigraphic guide has different definitions for these disciplines, thus, I decided to stick with the Guide. That's why this article is so different from its "parent". | ||
Latest revision as of 14:02, 26 September 2007
As I post this article, I add also a clarification. The original article in WP was really about geochronometry. I know many Earth scientists do not like to distinguish between geochronology and geochronometry (and I am among them). But the latest edition of the International Stratigraphic guide has different definitions for these disciplines, thus, I decided to stick with the Guide. That's why this article is so different from its "parent".
By the way, I am not totally satisfied with geochronometry. I wonder if someone could take a look and polish it...
Ciao, Nereo Preto 11:14, 14 November 2006 (CST)