Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tom Morris (New page: {{subpages}} '''Bland v. Airedale NHS Trust''' [1993] 1 All ER 821 HL is a House of Lords legal decision in England that allowed non-treatment of those in a pe...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
''' | '''Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland''' [1993] 1 [[All England Law Reports|All ER]] 821 HL is a House of Lords legal decision in England that allowed non-treatment of those in a persistent vegetative state. | ||
It concerned the life of Tony Bland, a Liverpool F.C. supporter who was injured in the [[Hillsborough disaster]]. Bland suffered severe brain damage and was in a persistent vegetative state with no hope of recovery. The law in England allowed for withdrawal of treatment from newborns but not from adults. The decisions of the appellate courts in Bland changed this and it is now legal for doctors to withdraw treatment from those in persistent vegetative states. | It concerned the life of Tony Bland, a Liverpool F.C. supporter who was injured in the [[Hillsborough disaster]]. Bland suffered severe brain damage and was in a persistent vegetative state with no hope of recovery. The law in England allowed for withdrawal of treatment from newborns but not from adults. The decisions of the appellate courts in Bland changed this and it is now legal for doctors to withdraw treatment from those in persistent vegetative states.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 11:01, 7 July 2024
Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] 1 All ER 821 HL is a House of Lords legal decision in England that allowed non-treatment of those in a persistent vegetative state.
It concerned the life of Tony Bland, a Liverpool F.C. supporter who was injured in the Hillsborough disaster. Bland suffered severe brain damage and was in a persistent vegetative state with no hope of recovery. The law in England allowed for withdrawal of treatment from newborns but not from adults. The decisions of the appellate courts in Bland changed this and it is now legal for doctors to withdraw treatment from those in persistent vegetative states.