Ammonia production: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
mNo edit summary
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


[[Image:Terra Nitrogen Plant.jpg|right|thumb|250px|{{#ifexist:Template:Terra Nitrogen Plant.jpg/credit|{{Terra Nitrogen Plant.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}Terra Nitrogen Plant in Verdigris, Oklahoma that produces ammonia and ammonia derived fertilizers]]
{{Image|Burrup Fertilizers' plant.jpg|right|350px|Burrup Fertilizers' plant in Western Australia that can produce 760,000 tonnes of liquid ammonia per year}}


'''Ammonia production''' facilities provide the base [[anhydrous]] liquid [[ammonia]] used predominantly in fertilizers supplying usable [[nitrogen]] for agricultural productivity. Ammonia is one of the most abundantly-produced [[Inorganic chemistry|inorganic chemicals]]. There are literally dozens of large-scale ammonia production plants throughout the industrial world, some of which produce as much as 2,000 to 3,000 tons per day of anhydrous ammonia in liquid form. The worldwide production in 2006 was 122,000,000 metric tons.<ref>[http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/nitrogen/nitromcs07.pdf United States Geological Survey publication]</ref> [[China]] produced 32.0% of the worldwide production followed by [[India]] with 8.9%, [[Russia]] with 8.2%, and the [[United States]] with 6.5%. Without such massive production, our agriculturally-dependent civilization would face serious challenges.
'''Ammonia production''' facilities provide the base [[anhydrous]] liquid [[ammonia]] used predominantly in fertilizers supplying usable [[nitrogen]] for agricultural productivity. Ammonia is one of the most abundantly-produced [[Inorganic chemistry|inorganic chemicals]]. There are literally dozens of large-scale ammonia production plants throughout the industrial world, some of which produce as much as 2,000 to 3,000 tons per day of anhydrous ammonia in liquid form. The worldwide production in 2006 was 122,000,000 metric tons.<ref>[http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/nitrogen/nitromcs07.pdf United States Geological Survey publication]</ref> China produced 32.0% of the worldwide production followed by [[India]] with 8.9%, [[Russia]] with 8.2%, and the [[United States of America]] with 6.5%. Without such massive production, our agriculturally-dependent civilization would face serious challenges.    


==History of ammonia manufacturing processes==
==History of ammonia manufacturing processes==


Before the start of [[World War I]], most ammonia was obtained by the dry [[distillation]] of [[nitrogenous]] vegetable and animal products; the reduction of [[nitrous acid]] and [[nitrite]]s with [[hydrogen]]; and the decomposition of [[ammonium salt]]s by [[alkaline hydroxides]] or by [[calcium oxide|quicklime]], the salt most generally used being the [[chloride]] ([[ammonium chloride|sal-ammoniac]]).
Before the start of [[World War I]], most ammonia was obtained by the dry [[distillation]] of [[nitrogenous]] vegetable and animal products; the reduction of [[nitrous acid]] and [[nitrite]]s with [[hydrogen]]; and the decomposition of [[ammonium salt]]s by [[alkaline hydroxides]] or by [[calcium oxide|quicklime]], the salt most generally used being the [[chloride]] ([[ammonium chloride|sal-ammoniac]]).


The [[Haber process]], which is the production of ammonia by combining hydrogen and [[nitrogen]], was first patented by [[Fritz Haber]] in 1908. In 1910, [[Carl Bosch]], while working for the [[Germany|German]] chemical company BASF, successfully commercialized the process and secured further patents. It was first used on an industrial scale by the Germans during World War I. Since then, the process has often been referred to as the [[Haber-Bosch  process]].
The [[Haber process]], which is the production of ammonia by combining hydrogen and [[nitrogen]], was first patented by [[Fritz Haber]] in 1908. In 1910, [[Carl Bosch]], while working for the [[Germany|German]] chemical company BASF, successfully commercialized the process and secured further patents. It was first used on an industrial scale by the Germans during World War I. Since then, the process has often been referred to as the [[Haber-Bosch  process]].
Line 13: Line 13:
==Modern ammonia-producing plants==
==Modern ammonia-producing plants==


[[Image:Steam-Methane Reformer.png|right|thumb|288px|{{#ifexist:Template:Steam-Methane Reformer.png/credit|{{Steam-Methane Reformer.png/credit}}<br/>|}}Block flow diagram of ammonia production processes]]
[[Image:Steam-Methane Reformer.png|right|thumb|288px|{{#ifexist:Template:Steam-Methane Reformer.png/credit|{{Steam-Methane Reformer.png/credit}}<br/>|}}[[Process flow diagram|Block flow diagram]] of ammonia production processes]]


A typical modern ammonia-producing plant first converts [[natural gas]] (i.e., [[methane]]) or [[Liquified petroleum gas|LPG]] (liquified petroleum [[gas]]es such as [[propane]] and [[butane]]) or petroleum [[naphtha]] into [[Gas|gaseous]] hydrogen. The method for producing hydrogen from [[hydrocarbon]]s is referred to as [[Steam reforming|"steam reforming"]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Gary Maxwell|title=Synthetic Nitrogen Products: A Practical Guide to the Products and Processes|edition=First Edition|publisher=Springer|year=2004|id=ISBN 0-306-48225-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | author=Twygg, Martyn V. | title=Catalyst Handbook | edition=2nd Edition | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1989 | id=ISBN 1-874545-36-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Samuel Strelzoff|title=Technology and Manufacture of Ammonia|edition=|publisher=Krieger Publishing|year= 1987|id=ISBN 0-89464-250-2}}</ref><ref name=McKetta>{{cite book|author=John J. Mcketta (Editor)|title=Chemical Processing Handbook|edition=1st Edition|publisher=CRC|year=1993|id=ISBN 0-8247-8701-3}}</ref> The hydrogen is then combined with nitrogen to produce ammonia. <ref name=Jennings>{{cite book|author=J.R. Jennings (Editor)|title=Catalytic Ammonia Synthesis|edition=First Edition|publisher=Springer|year=1991|id=ISBN 0-306-43628-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Sami Matar and Lewis F. Hatch|title=Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes|edition=Second Edition|publisher=Gulf Publishing|year=2001|id=ISBN 0-8841-5315-0}}</ref>
A typical modern ammonia-producing plant first converts [[natural gas]] (i.e., [[methane]]) or [[Liquified petroleum gas|LPG]] (liquified petroleum [[gas]]es such as [[propane]] and [[butane]]) or petroleum [[naphtha]] into [[Gas|gaseous]] hydrogen. The method for producing hydrogen from [[hydrocarbon]]s is referred to as [[Steam reforming|"steam reforming"]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Gary Maxwell|title=Synthetic Nitrogen Products: A Practical Guide to the Products and Processes|edition=First Edition|publisher=Springer|year=2004|id=ISBN 0-306-48225-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | author=Twygg, Martyn V. | title=Catalyst Handbook | edition=2nd Edition | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1989 | id=ISBN 1-874545-36-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Samuel Strelzoff|title=Technology and Manufacture of Ammonia|edition=|publisher=Krieger Publishing|year= 1987|id=ISBN 0-89464-250-2}}</ref><ref name=McKetta>{{cite book|author=John J. Mcketta (Editor)|title=Chemical Processing Handbook|edition=1st Edition|publisher=CRC|year=1993|id=ISBN 0-8247-8701-3}}</ref> The hydrogen is then combined with nitrogen to produce ammonia. <ref name=Jennings>{{cite book|author=J.R. Jennings (Editor)|title=Catalytic Ammonia Synthesis|edition=First Edition|publisher=Springer|year=1991|id=ISBN 0-306-43628-0}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Sami Matar and Lewis F. Hatch|title=Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes|edition=Second Edition|publisher=Gulf Publishing|year=2001|id=ISBN 0-8841-5315-0}}</ref>
Line 19: Line 19:
Starting with a natural gas feedstock, the processes used in producing the hydrogen are:
Starting with a natural gas feedstock, the processes used in producing the hydrogen are:


* The first step in the process is to remove [[sulfur]] compounds from the feedstock because sulfur deactivates the [[catalyst]]s used in subsequent steps. Sulfur removal requires catalytic [[hydrogenation]] to convert organic sulfur compounds (RSH) in the feedstocks to gaseous [[hydrogen sulfide]] (H<sub>2</sub>S):
* The first step in the process is to remove [[sulphur]] compounds from the feedstock because sulfur deactivates the [[catalyst]]s used in subsequent steps. Sulfur removal requires catalytic [[hydrogenation]] to convert organic sulfur compounds (RSH) in the feedstocks to gaseous [[hydrogen sulphide]] (H<sub>2</sub>S):


::H<sub>2</sub> + RSH →  RH + H<sub>2</sub>S([[gas]])
::H<sub>2</sub> + RSH →  RH + H<sub>2</sub>S ([[gas]])


*The gaseous hydrogen sulfide is then absorbed and removed by passing it through beds of [[zinc oxide]] (ZnO) where it is converted to solid [[zinc sulfide]] (ZnS):
*The gaseous hydrogen sulfide is then passed through a reactor containing [[zinc oxide]] (ZnO) where it is converted to solid [[zinc sulfide]] (ZnS) in a batch process (i.e., when all of the zinc oxide has been converted to zinc sulfide it is removed and replaced with fresh zinc oxide):


::H<sub>2</sub>S + ZnO → ZnS + H<sub>2</sub>O
::H<sub>2</sub>S + ZnO → ZnS + H<sub>2</sub>O


* [[Catalytic]] steam reforming of the sulfur-free methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) feedstock is then used to form [[carbon monoxide]] (CO) plus hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>): :
* [[Catalysis|Catalytic]] steam reforming of the sulfur-free methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) feedstock is then used to form [[carbon monoxide]] (CO) plus hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>):


::CH<sub>4</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O → CO + 3H<sub>2</sub>
::CH<sub>4</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O → CO + 3H<sub>2</sub>
Line 66: Line 66:
* Refrigerant in household, commercial and industrial [[refrigeration system]]s
* Refrigerant in household, commercial and industrial [[refrigeration system]]s
* Manufacture of [[dyes]]
* Manufacture of [[dyes]]
* Manufacture of [[explosives]]
* Manufacture of explosives
* Cleaning solutions
* Cleaning solutions


Line 75: Line 75:
Storage tanks on farms used for dispensing ammonia as fertilizer are referred to as ''nurse'' tanks and contain approximately 2,500 [[U.S. customary units|pounds]] (1134 [[kg]]) of anhydrous ammonia, so any farm with four or more nurse tanks needs to assess its safety. In fact, the [[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]] (U.S. EPA) mandates the performance of an [[Offsite Consequence Analysis]] (OCA) as part of their [[Risk Management Plan]] (RMP) requirements for any facility that stores more than 10,000 pounds (4,536 kg) of anhydrous liquid ammonia or 20,000 pounds (9,072 kg) of aqueous solutions of ammonia.<ref>[http://www.epa.gov/oecaagct/trmp.html Risk Management Plan] (from the website of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)</ref> The RMP requirements apply for ammonia refrigeration systems or any other ammonia storage facilities as well as farms. The [[U.S. Occupational Health & Safety Administration]](OSHA) has mandated very similar requirements as part of [[Process Safety Management]] (PSM) regulations for hazardous chemicals.<ref>[http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9760 Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals] (from the website of the U.S. Occupational Health & Safety Administration)</ref>  
Storage tanks on farms used for dispensing ammonia as fertilizer are referred to as ''nurse'' tanks and contain approximately 2,500 [[U.S. customary units|pounds]] (1134 [[kg]]) of anhydrous ammonia, so any farm with four or more nurse tanks needs to assess its safety. In fact, the [[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]] (U.S. EPA) mandates the performance of an [[Offsite Consequence Analysis]] (OCA) as part of their [[Risk Management Plan]] (RMP) requirements for any facility that stores more than 10,000 pounds (4,536 kg) of anhydrous liquid ammonia or 20,000 pounds (9,072 kg) of aqueous solutions of ammonia.<ref>[http://www.epa.gov/oecaagct/trmp.html Risk Management Plan] (from the website of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)</ref> The RMP requirements apply for ammonia refrigeration systems or any other ammonia storage facilities as well as farms. The [[U.S. Occupational Health & Safety Administration]](OSHA) has mandated very similar requirements as part of [[Process Safety Management]] (PSM) regulations for hazardous chemicals.<ref>[http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9760 Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals] (from the website of the U.S. Occupational Health & Safety Administration)</ref>  
   
   
In transport, ammonia containers must have proper hazardous material placards, and, if the pertinent threshold quantitity is exceeded, may need additional safeguards, such as reporting the shipment to industry monitoring services such as CHEMTREC<ref name=Chemtrec>{{citation
In transport, ammonia containers must have proper hazardous material placards, and, if the pertinent threshold quantity is exceeded, may need additional safeguards, such as reporting the shipment to industry monitoring services such as CHEMTREC<ref name=Chemtrec>{{citation
  | url = http://www.chemtrec.com/Chemtrec/
  | url = http://www.chemtrec.com/Chemtrec/
  | title = CHEMTREC: the 24-hour HAZMAT Communications Center}}</ref> or additional local agencies. There may be restrictions on transporting hazardous materials through tunnels, or possibly streets in high-density areas.
  | title = CHEMTREC: the 24-hour HAZMAT Communications Center}}</ref> or additional local agencies. There may be restrictions on transporting hazardous materials through tunnels, or possibly streets in high-density areas.


The [[U.S. Department of Homeland Security]], citing its major concern as toxic release, lists anhydrous ammonia, or mixtures containing at least 1 percent ammonia, when stored in quantites of 10,000 pounds or more, as a chemical of interest,<ref name=DHS-CoI> {{citation | url = http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/programs/gc_1185897486043.shtm
The [[U.S. Department of Homeland Security]], citing its major concern as toxic release, lists anhydrous ammonia, or mixtures containing at least 1 percent ammonia, when stored in quantities of 10,000 pounds or more, as a chemical of interest, which falls under the Risk for Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) regulations and guidance.<ref>[http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/chemsec_appendixa-chemicalofinterestlist.pdf Federal Register (November 20, 2007)] Part II, Department of Homeland Security, 6 CFR Part 27 Appendix to Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards; Final Rule</ref> Organizations that store or transport more than the threshold quantity of 10,000 pounds, or believe they are at a higher than normal risk, should use the Chemical Security Assessment Tool.<ref>[http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/docs/chem/csalert.pdf Chemical Security Assessment Tool] (From the website of the U.S. DHS</ref>
| date = November 20, 2007
| title = 6 CFR Part 27 Appendix to Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards; Final Rule
| author = U.S. Department of Homeland Security}}</ref> which falls under the Risk for Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) regulations and guidance.<ref name=DHS6CF27> {{citation | url = http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/chemsec_appendixa-chemicalofinterestlist.pdf
| title = DHS Finalizes List of Chemicals Subject to Anti-terrorism Regs}}</ref> Organizations that store or transport more than the threshold quantity of 10,000 pounds, or believe they are at a higher than normal risk, should use the Chemical Security Assessment Tool. <ref name=CSAT>{{citation
| url = http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/programs/gc_1169501486197.shtm
| author = U.S. Department of Homeland Security
| title = Chemical Security Assessment Tool}}</ref>


The Environmental Protection Agency has issued an additional safeguards document, with special emphasis on the theft of ammonia.<ref name=EPANH3>{{citation
The Environmental Protection Agency has issued an additional safeguards document, with special emphasis on the theft of ammonia.<ref>[http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/docs/chem/csalert.pdf Anhydrous Ammonia Theft] (From the website of the U.S. EPA)</ref>
| url = http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/eoe/docs/csalert.pdf
| title = Chemical Safety Alert: Anhydrous Ammonia Theft
| author = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
| date = March 2000}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 16:01, 9 July 2024

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article has an approved citable version (see its Citable Version subpage). While we have done conscientious work, we cannot guarantee that this Main Article, or its citable version, is wholly free of mistakes. By helping to improve this editable Main Article, you will help the process of generating a new, improved citable version.
© Photograph provided by courtesy of Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd
Burrup Fertilizers' plant in Western Australia that can produce 760,000 tonnes of liquid ammonia per year

Ammonia production facilities provide the base anhydrous liquid ammonia used predominantly in fertilizers supplying usable nitrogen for agricultural productivity. Ammonia is one of the most abundantly-produced inorganic chemicals. There are literally dozens of large-scale ammonia production plants throughout the industrial world, some of which produce as much as 2,000 to 3,000 tons per day of anhydrous ammonia in liquid form. The worldwide production in 2006 was 122,000,000 metric tons.[1] China produced 32.0% of the worldwide production followed by India with 8.9%, Russia with 8.2%, and the United States of America with 6.5%. Without such massive production, our agriculturally-dependent civilization would face serious challenges.

History of ammonia manufacturing processes

Before the start of World War I, most ammonia was obtained by the dry distillation of nitrogenous vegetable and animal products; the reduction of nitrous acid and nitrites with hydrogen; and the decomposition of ammonium salts by alkaline hydroxides or by quicklime, the salt most generally used being the chloride (sal-ammoniac).

The Haber process, which is the production of ammonia by combining hydrogen and nitrogen, was first patented by Fritz Haber in 1908. In 1910, Carl Bosch, while working for the German chemical company BASF, successfully commercialized the process and secured further patents. It was first used on an industrial scale by the Germans during World War I. Since then, the process has often been referred to as the Haber-Bosch process.

Modern ammonia-producing plants

(PD) Image: Milton Beychok
Block flow diagram of ammonia production processes

A typical modern ammonia-producing plant first converts natural gas (i.e., methane) or LPG (liquified petroleum gases such as propane and butane) or petroleum naphtha into gaseous hydrogen. The method for producing hydrogen from hydrocarbons is referred to as "steam reforming".[2][3][4][5] The hydrogen is then combined with nitrogen to produce ammonia. [6][7]

Starting with a natural gas feedstock, the processes used in producing the hydrogen are:

  • The first step in the process is to remove sulphur compounds from the feedstock because sulfur deactivates the catalysts used in subsequent steps. Sulfur removal requires catalytic hydrogenation to convert organic sulfur compounds (RSH) in the feedstocks to gaseous hydrogen sulphide (H2S):
H2 + RSH → RH + H2S (gas)
  • The gaseous hydrogen sulfide is then passed through a reactor containing zinc oxide (ZnO) where it is converted to solid zinc sulfide (ZnS) in a batch process (i.e., when all of the zinc oxide has been converted to zinc sulfide it is removed and replaced with fresh zinc oxide):
H2S + ZnO → ZnS + H2O
  • Catalytic steam reforming of the sulfur-free methane (CH4) feedstock is then used to form carbon monoxide (CO) plus hydrogen (H2):
CH4 + H2O → CO + 3H2
CO + H2O → CO2 + H2
  • The carbon dioxide is then removed either by absorption in aqueous ethanolamine solutions or by adsorption in pressure swing adsorbers (PSA) using proprietary solid adsorption media.
  • The final step in producing the hydrogen is to use catalytic methanation to remove any small residual amounts of carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide from the hydrogen by converting them into methane:
CO + 3H2 → CH4 + H2O
CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 +2H2O

To produce the desired end-product ammonia, the hydrogen is then catalytically reacted with nitrogen (N2) derived from process air to form anhydrous liquid ammonia (NH3). This step is known as the "ammonia synthesis loop" (also referred to as the Haber-Bosch process):

3H2 + N2 → 2NH3

The nitrogen required for the Haber-Bosch process is obtained in either of these two ways:

  • The catalytic steam reformer has two sections: a primary reformer and a secondary reformer. By the introduction of air into the secondary reformer, the air reacts with some of the hydrogen produced in the primary reformer to form nitrogen and water:[5][6]
H2 + air → N2 + H2O

The steam reforming, shift conversion, carbon dioxide removal and methanation steps each operate at absolute pressures of about 25 to 35 bar, and the ammonia synthesis loop operates at absolute pressures ranging from 60 to 180 bar depending upon which proprietary design is used. There are many engineering and construction companies that offer proprietary designs for ammonia synthesis plants. Haldor Topsoe of Denmark, Technip of France, Uhde GmbH of Germany, and Kellogg Brown & Root of the United States are among the most experienced companies in that field.

Uses of ammonia

About 80% or more of the ammonia produced is used for fertilizing agricultural crops in the form of aqua ammonia (an aqueous solution of ammonia), ammonium sulfate (NH4)2SO4, ammonium phosphate (NH4)3PO4, ammonium nitrate NH4NO3 and urea (NH2)2CO. Some anhydrous liquid ammonia is also used directly as a fertilizer.

Ammonia is also used for:

Safety concerns with ammonia

There are several safety-related concerns with anhydrous ammonia and with aqueous solutions of ammonia. It is a respiratory irritant that is a highly hazardous chemical.[8] Release could take place through a simple industrial or transportation accident, a deliberate release caused by terrorists, or by improper handling by those using it in the illegal synthesis of methamphetamines.

Storage tanks on farms used for dispensing ammonia as fertilizer are referred to as nurse tanks and contain approximately 2,500 pounds (1134 kg) of anhydrous ammonia, so any farm with four or more nurse tanks needs to assess its safety. In fact, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) mandates the performance of an Offsite Consequence Analysis (OCA) as part of their Risk Management Plan (RMP) requirements for any facility that stores more than 10,000 pounds (4,536 kg) of anhydrous liquid ammonia or 20,000 pounds (9,072 kg) of aqueous solutions of ammonia.[9] The RMP requirements apply for ammonia refrigeration systems or any other ammonia storage facilities as well as farms. The U.S. Occupational Health & Safety Administration(OSHA) has mandated very similar requirements as part of Process Safety Management (PSM) regulations for hazardous chemicals.[10]

In transport, ammonia containers must have proper hazardous material placards, and, if the pertinent threshold quantity is exceeded, may need additional safeguards, such as reporting the shipment to industry monitoring services such as CHEMTREC[11] or additional local agencies. There may be restrictions on transporting hazardous materials through tunnels, or possibly streets in high-density areas.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, citing its major concern as toxic release, lists anhydrous ammonia, or mixtures containing at least 1 percent ammonia, when stored in quantities of 10,000 pounds or more, as a chemical of interest, which falls under the Risk for Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) regulations and guidance.[12] Organizations that store or transport more than the threshold quantity of 10,000 pounds, or believe they are at a higher than normal risk, should use the Chemical Security Assessment Tool.[13]

The Environmental Protection Agency has issued an additional safeguards document, with special emphasis on the theft of ammonia.[14]

References

  1. United States Geological Survey publication
  2. Gary Maxwell (2004). Synthetic Nitrogen Products: A Practical Guide to the Products and Processes, First Edition. Springer. ISBN 0-306-48225-8. 
  3. Twygg, Martyn V. (1989). Catalyst Handbook, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press. ISBN 1-874545-36-7. 
  4. Samuel Strelzoff (1987). Technology and Manufacture of Ammonia. Krieger Publishing. ISBN 0-89464-250-2. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 John J. Mcketta (Editor) (1993). Chemical Processing Handbook, 1st Edition. CRC. ISBN 0-8247-8701-3. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 J.R. Jennings (Editor) (1991). Catalytic Ammonia Synthesis, First Edition. Springer. ISBN 0-306-43628-0. 
  7. Sami Matar and Lewis F. Hatch (2001). Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes, Second Edition. Gulf Publishing. ISBN 0-8841-5315-0. 
  8. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards
  9. Risk Management Plan (from the website of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
  10. Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals (from the website of the U.S. Occupational Health & Safety Administration)
  11. CHEMTREC: the 24-hour HAZMAT Communications Center
  12. Federal Register (November 20, 2007) Part II, Department of Homeland Security, 6 CFR Part 27 Appendix to Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards; Final Rule
  13. Chemical Security Assessment Tool (From the website of the U.S. DHS
  14. Anhydrous Ammonia Theft (From the website of the U.S. EPA)