Talk:Pronoun: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard Arvi Hughes
(checklist)
 
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Pronoun
 
|                cat1 = Linguistics
== Issues ==
|                cat2 =  
 
|                cat3 =  
This and other entries need to be very carefully written.  There are multiple models within linguistics, and the traditional "parts of speech" notion still taught in elementary schools in the US is simply not used by linguists any more.  We'd need to talk about functional linguistics, and may want to consider using "word classes" instead of parts of speech.  English itself is also a very anomalous language in many respects, and we need to qualify any statements here that refer to issues specific to English, as opposed to structures common to larger language families, or language as a whole.
|          cat_check = n
 
|              status = 3
I hope linguists here on CZ will be conscious of these issues; I wouldn't want to see a bunch of new entries that don't take account of them.  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 08:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 07:46, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
}}

Latest revision as of 12:21, 13 November 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A pro-form that substitutes for a noun (or noun phrase) with or without a determiner, such as you and they in English. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Linguistics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Issues

This and other entries need to be very carefully written. There are multiple models within linguistics, and the traditional "parts of speech" notion still taught in elementary schools in the US is simply not used by linguists any more. We'd need to talk about functional linguistics, and may want to consider using "word classes" instead of parts of speech. English itself is also a very anomalous language in many respects, and we need to qualify any statements here that refer to issues specific to English, as opposed to structures common to larger language families, or language as a whole.

I hope linguists here on CZ will be conscious of these issues; I wouldn't want to see a bunch of new entries that don't take account of them. Russell Potter 08:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)