Whig Party, Britain: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Jensen (add article (zero from Wiki)) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
The term “Whig” was originally an abusive term for the country party under Shaftesbury in 1679. It was based on the aristocracy and | The '''Whig Party in Britain''' was dominant from 1688 to 1760, and again in the 1830s and 1840s. It was the name of a coalition of like-minded leaders of Parliament, and was not organized among voters. | ||
The term “Whig” was originally an abusive term for the country party under Shaftesbury in 1679. It was based on the aristocracy and businessmen from the trading community and the City of London. It upheld parliamentary supremacy and toleration for nonconformist Protestants (but not for Catholics). The Whigs were primarily responsible for the Glorious Revolution of 1688; the "Whig Junto" was a powerful faction during the reigns of William III and Anne. The Whigs were united in opposition to the “Jacobites” (the followers of exiled James II) and put the Hanoverian George I in power. Tories at that time were suspected of disloyalty, so the Whigs under Walpole had a monopoly of power until George III became king in 1760. Then the Whigs were largely in opposition with the Tories dominant. Their great leader, and opponent of George III, was [[Charles James Fox]].<ref> In the American colonies, the term "Whig" was adopted by the patriots, who denounced the Loyalists and Tories in the colonies and in Britain.</ref> | |||
In the 18th century Whigs were not organized as a party in the modern sense and consisted largely of personal groups contending for power among themselves, kept together by friendship and patronage rather than policies and principles. They were eclipsed by the new toryism of the younger Pitt from 1783 and after the French Revolution many became Tories. They began to recover unity by supporting moral reforms, especially the abolition of slavery and emancipation of the Catholics. They triumphed in 1830 as champions of Parliamentary reform. Earl Grey was a key leader as prime minister, and the Reform Act of 1832 was their signature measure, by broadening the franchise. It ended the system of "rotten borough" and "pocket boroughs" where elections were controlled by powerful families, and instead redistributed power on the basis of population. Only the rich and middle classes voted, so this shifted power away from the landed aristocracy to the urban middle classes. In 1832 they abolished slavery in the Empire, by purchasing and freeing the slaves, especially those in the Caribbean sugar islands. The Factory Act of 1832 reduced child labour. Thus between 1830 and 1841 they effected some major reforms. They also acquired many followers of Robert Peel after the Tory party split in 1846. In terms of image, "Tory" suggested gloomy, cynical and cautious, and somewhat sceptically of fancy notions like `freedom' and `progress'. "Whig," by contrast, was more optimistic and occasionally quite radical, placing little value on stuffy old customs. In terms of economic policy the Whigs favouring an open, `free trade' relationship rather than the old-fashioned `protectionist' ideas of the Tories. Increasingly after 1832 the term “Liberal” replaced “Whig”, so that by the late 1860s it was in disuse. See [[Liberal Party, Britain]] | |||
==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
* John Carswell; ''The Old Cause: Three Biographical Studies in Whiggism.'' 1954 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=24628959 online edition] | * John Carswell; ''The Old Cause: Three Biographical Studies in Whiggism.'' 1954 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=24628959 online edition] | ||
* | * Harry T. Dickinson; ''Walpole and the Whig Supremacy.'' 1973 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=23431431 online edition] | ||
* Warren M. Elofson. ''The Rockingham Connection and the Second Founding of the Whig Party 1768-1773'' 1996 | * Warren M. Elofson. ''The Rockingham Connection and the Second Founding of the Whig Party 1768-1773'' 1996 | ||
* Keith Feiling; ''A History of the Tory Party, 1640-1714,'' 1924 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=6610420 online edition]; ''The Second Tory Party, 1714-1832,'' 1938 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=58567794 online edition] | * Keith Feiling; ''A History of the Tory Party, 1640-1714,'' 1924 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=6610420 online edition]; ''The Second Tory Party, 1714-1832,'' 1938 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=58567794 online edition] | ||
* | * James R. Jones; ''The First Whigs: The Politics of the Exclusion Crisis, 1678-1683,'' 1961 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=98156041 online edition] | ||
* | * John P. Kenyon. ''Revolution Principles: The Politics of Party, 1689-1720,'' (1977) | ||
* George Otto Trevelyan | * Ronald Buchanan McCallum; ''The Liberal Party from Earl Grey to Asquith'' (1963) | ||
* Leslie G. Mitchell. ''Charles James Fox and the Disintegration of the Whig Party, 1782-1794,'' (1971) | |||
* Loren Dudley Reid. ''Charles James Fox: a Man for the People,'' 1969 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=57023294 online edition] | |||
* George Otto Trevelyan. ''The Early History of Charles James Fox'' (1880) [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0iqqthHH051OaNLQB5&id=rJcgAAAAMAAJ&dq=whig+party&as_brr=1 online edition] | |||
* Basil Williams and C. H. Stuart; ''The Whig Supremacy, 1714-1760,'' 1962 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=96743013 online edition] | |||
* Ernest Llewellyn Woodward. ''The Age of Reform, 1815-1870,'' 1938 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=18250278 online edition] | |||
==References== | |||
<references/> | |||
[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 17:00, 7 November 2024
The Whig Party in Britain was dominant from 1688 to 1760, and again in the 1830s and 1840s. It was the name of a coalition of like-minded leaders of Parliament, and was not organized among voters. The term “Whig” was originally an abusive term for the country party under Shaftesbury in 1679. It was based on the aristocracy and businessmen from the trading community and the City of London. It upheld parliamentary supremacy and toleration for nonconformist Protestants (but not for Catholics). The Whigs were primarily responsible for the Glorious Revolution of 1688; the "Whig Junto" was a powerful faction during the reigns of William III and Anne. The Whigs were united in opposition to the “Jacobites” (the followers of exiled James II) and put the Hanoverian George I in power. Tories at that time were suspected of disloyalty, so the Whigs under Walpole had a monopoly of power until George III became king in 1760. Then the Whigs were largely in opposition with the Tories dominant. Their great leader, and opponent of George III, was Charles James Fox.[1]
In the 18th century Whigs were not organized as a party in the modern sense and consisted largely of personal groups contending for power among themselves, kept together by friendship and patronage rather than policies and principles. They were eclipsed by the new toryism of the younger Pitt from 1783 and after the French Revolution many became Tories. They began to recover unity by supporting moral reforms, especially the abolition of slavery and emancipation of the Catholics. They triumphed in 1830 as champions of Parliamentary reform. Earl Grey was a key leader as prime minister, and the Reform Act of 1832 was their signature measure, by broadening the franchise. It ended the system of "rotten borough" and "pocket boroughs" where elections were controlled by powerful families, and instead redistributed power on the basis of population. Only the rich and middle classes voted, so this shifted power away from the landed aristocracy to the urban middle classes. In 1832 they abolished slavery in the Empire, by purchasing and freeing the slaves, especially those in the Caribbean sugar islands. The Factory Act of 1832 reduced child labour. Thus between 1830 and 1841 they effected some major reforms. They also acquired many followers of Robert Peel after the Tory party split in 1846. In terms of image, "Tory" suggested gloomy, cynical and cautious, and somewhat sceptically of fancy notions like `freedom' and `progress'. "Whig," by contrast, was more optimistic and occasionally quite radical, placing little value on stuffy old customs. In terms of economic policy the Whigs favouring an open, `free trade' relationship rather than the old-fashioned `protectionist' ideas of the Tories. Increasingly after 1832 the term “Liberal” replaced “Whig”, so that by the late 1860s it was in disuse. See Liberal Party, Britain
Bibliography
- John Carswell; The Old Cause: Three Biographical Studies in Whiggism. 1954 online edition
- Harry T. Dickinson; Walpole and the Whig Supremacy. 1973 online edition
- Warren M. Elofson. The Rockingham Connection and the Second Founding of the Whig Party 1768-1773 1996
- Keith Feiling; A History of the Tory Party, 1640-1714, 1924 online edition; The Second Tory Party, 1714-1832, 1938 online edition
- James R. Jones; The First Whigs: The Politics of the Exclusion Crisis, 1678-1683, 1961 online edition
- John P. Kenyon. Revolution Principles: The Politics of Party, 1689-1720, (1977)
- Ronald Buchanan McCallum; The Liberal Party from Earl Grey to Asquith (1963)
- Leslie G. Mitchell. Charles James Fox and the Disintegration of the Whig Party, 1782-1794, (1971)
- Loren Dudley Reid. Charles James Fox: a Man for the People, 1969 online edition
- George Otto Trevelyan. The Early History of Charles James Fox (1880) online edition
- Basil Williams and C. H. Stuart; The Whig Supremacy, 1714-1760, 1962 online edition
- Ernest Llewellyn Woodward. The Age of Reform, 1815-1870, 1938 online edition
References
- ↑ In the American colonies, the term "Whig" was adopted by the patriots, who denounced the Loyalists and Tories in the colonies and in Britain.