Talk:Sexual dimorphism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
 
imported>Joe Quick
(subpages template)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Sexual dimorphism
 
|                cat1 = Biology
== Definition? ==
|                cat2 = Agriculture
 
|                cat3 = Hobbies
I changed the definition slightly to define sexual dimorphisms as physical differences not including the difference in sex organs. Is it part of the definition that sexual dimorphisms ''must'' be readily apparent, or is this just generally the case? If they must be readily apparent, the definition should be modified accordingly.
|          cat_check = Y
 
|              status = 3
:You forgot to sign :P
|        underlinked = Y
:I always think of this as readily apparent differences in animals, which would make both the new edit and the addition of plants with different sexual components inaccurate.  I'm not a biologist, so I think we'll have to ask the experts.
|            cleanup = Y
:[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 22:57, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 21:41, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
}}

Latest revision as of 21:47, 9 November 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The physical differences that exist between males and females of a given species. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Biology, Agriculture and Hobbies [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Dogs
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Definition?

I changed the definition slightly to define sexual dimorphisms as physical differences not including the difference in sex organs. Is it part of the definition that sexual dimorphisms must be readily apparent, or is this just generally the case? If they must be readily apparent, the definition should be modified accordingly.

You forgot to sign :P
I always think of this as readily apparent differences in animals, which would make both the new edit and the addition of plants with different sexual components inaccurate. I'm not a biologist, so I think we'll have to ask the experts.
Aleta Curry 22:57, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Sexual_dimorphism&oldid=27264"