Talk:Prime Minister of the United Kingdom: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>John Stephenson (→Jim Hacker?: Your proposal meets with broad approval in principle) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Jim Hacker? == | |||
Shall we include that PM and his key advisers? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Your proposal meets with broad approval in principle, but some of the principles are sufficiently fundamental in principle, and some of the considerations so complex and finely balanced in practice that in principle it is proposed that the sensible and prudent practice would be to submit the proposal for more detailed consideration, laying stress on the essential continuity of the new proposal with existing principles, the principal of the principal arguments which the proposal proposes and propounds for their approval. In principle... © Sir Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn. | |||
:[[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 07:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:05, 6 August 2009
Jim Hacker?
Shall we include that PM and his key advisers? Howard C. Berkowitz 19:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Your proposal meets with broad approval in principle, but some of the principles are sufficiently fundamental in principle, and some of the considerations so complex and finely balanced in practice that in principle it is proposed that the sensible and prudent practice would be to submit the proposal for more detailed consideration, laying stress on the essential continuity of the new proposal with existing principles, the principal of the principal arguments which the proposal proposes and propounds for their approval. In principle... © Sir Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn.
- John Stephenson 07:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)